<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Ol&#039; Bag of Donuts &#187; DeShawn Wynn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/tag/deshawn-wynn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com</link>
	<description>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.13" mode="simple" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Adam Somers</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Adam Somers</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com (Adam Somers)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Green Bay Packers</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Sports &amp; Recreation">
		<itunes:category text="Professional" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Restricted free agent tenders announced (sort of)</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/04/restricted-free-agent-tenders-announced-sort-of/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/04/restricted-free-agent-tenders-announced-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers Free Agency News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari Bigby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryn Colledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Spitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Kapinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kuhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Jolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korey Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Havner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tramon Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Blackmon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Earlier Wednesday, the Green Bay Packers gave word that they had placed tenders on eight of their nine restricted free agents. They also tendered one of their exclusive rights free agents.</p>
<p>The deadline for doing so was Thursday, so this announcement wasn&#8217;t a major surprise or anything.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know everything yet, as far as who got what tender, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier Wednesday, the Green Bay Packers gave word that they had placed tenders on eight of their nine restricted free agents. They also tendered one of their exclusive rights free agents.</p>
<p>The deadline for doing so was Thursday, so this announcement wasn&#8217;t a major surprise or anything.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know everything yet, as far as who got what tender, but the fine folks at <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/86287677.html">the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel </a>- man, those guys are good &#8211; were able to get most of the details.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what we know (and, as always, here&#8217;s what I think):</p>
<ul>
<li>Free safety Nick Collins received the highest tender (a first-and-third round pick). No surprise there. Of course, I&#8217;m also pretty sure there&#8217;s NO way he&#8217;ll sign that tender. He wants a new deal. A $3.35 million salary for next season just won&#8217;t cut it.</li>
<li>Strong safety Atari Bigby received a second round tender. Again, no surprise. Bigby did JUST enough to earn one more shot. At a price of $1.759 million, he&#8217;s worth one more year. And he will be back. No one&#8217;s giving up a two for Bigby, trust me.</li>
<li>Center/guard Jason Spitz was also tendered at the second round level ($1.759 million). A mild surprise as that&#8217;s one notch higher than I thought he&#8217;d get. I had him pegged for a &#8220;right of first refusal&#8221; tender. In that scenario, Green Bay would get a third rounder if he signed somewhere else. Spitz is similar to Bigby in that he&#8217;s done enough to earn one more look. And, again, he will be back, because his back is still an issue until he shows he&#8217;s fully healthy.</li>
<li>Corner/return specialist Will Blackmon and fullback John Kuhn received &#8220;right of first refusal&#8221; tenders. Each will make $1.176 million this season and the team can still match any contract they sign elsewhere. If the Packers do not match, they will receive a fourth round pick for Blackmon. They get nothing for Kuhn, though, as he was an undrafted free agent. I wouldn&#8217;t have brought Blackmon back. He&#8217;s got potential, yes, but he&#8217;s also always hurt. Still, at that price, I&#8217;m not outraged. I thought Kuhn was an unrestricted free agent, so my bad on getting that information wrong, guys. Again, I would not have brought him back as there are already two other fullbacks on the roster. But, since Korey Hall has had some injury troubles and Quinn Johnson is still largely an unknown, I can see why they did it. As is the case with Blackmon, I&#8217;m not outraged.</li>
<li>Tight end Spencer Havner, an exclusive rights free agent, received a tender, although it is unknown what, exactly (the Journal Sentinel estimates $470,000). Good call bringing Havner back. He&#8217;s got some upside.</li>
<li>Punter Jeremy Kapinos (exclusive rights) and running back DeShawn Wynn (restricted) did not receive tenders, automatically making them free agents. Kapinos, as I&#8217;ve said seemingly dozens of times by now, was terrible and needed to be let go. Wynn has some potential, but is always, always hurt. No point bringing him back. I like both these moves.</li>
</ul>
<p>What is unknown, as of now, are the level of tenders placed on guard Daryn Colledge, corner Tramon Williams and defensive end Johnny Jolly, although the team announced all three were given tenders. The Journal Sentinel &#8211; again, man those guys are good &#8211; is guessing second rounder tenders for Jolly and Colledge and a first or second for Williams. I&#8217;d agree on the Jolly tender and it&#8217;s no real surprise. If his legal issues weren&#8217;t still pending (seriously, can we just get this thing over with?), I&#8217;d be a bit worried that another team would come after him at that level. But they are still pending, so he&#8217;ll be back.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s puzzling is why Colledge was brought back at a second round tender. Couldn&#8217;t the team have just put a &#8220;right of first refusal&#8221; tag on him? It&#8217;d get the same compensation if he left and save itself roughly $600,000 as Colledge was a second round pick. Am I wrong? I have some thoughts on Colledge coming back for one more year, as well, and I&#8217;ll share them soon enough.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;d hope the team placed a first-round tender on Williams. He&#8217;s only 26 and has a bright future as a starter ahead of him. Plus, he&#8217;s the only corner not named &#8220;Charles Woodson&#8221; or &#8220;Al Harris&#8221; that the Packers can really trust. If I&#8217;m an opposing GM and I only have to give up a two for a proven player like Williams, I make that move every time. Green Bay can&#8217;t allow that to happen.</p>
<p>As for what these tenders will cost the Packers collectively, the Journal Sentinel &#8211; have I mentioned that I think those guys are really good? &#8211; estimates it will be somewhere between $14.89 and $15.6 million, depending on how Williams is tendered.</p>
<p>I did the math on this &#8211; which was tough for me because I suck at math &#8211; and the nine restricted players made roughly $11.2 million last season, meaning it will cost the Packers, as of now, roughly $4 million more to bring all of them back. When you think about the size of the group and some of the key players in it, an extra $4 million isn&#8217;t that bad.</p>
<p>Plus, the team saves about $800,000 by not bringing Kapinos or Wynn back&#8230;so that&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>(<strong>Update, Friday morning, 12:34 a.m.:</strong> <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/86486577.html">The Journal Sentinel is now reporting </a>that Williams was bumped up to a first-and-third round tender and Jolly was boosted to a first-round tender. Good move on both parts as these two &#8211; Williams in particular &#8211; could very well have been targeted by other teams before. Now, though, it&#8217;s basically a lock that the two return to Green Bay. Whew. The upgrades tack on roughly another $1.5 million, meaning it will now cost the team about $5.5 million in additional money to tender the nine players. Still, not an outrageous total at all.)</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/04/restricted-free-agent-tenders-announced-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offseason to-do list: Green Bay&#8217;s restricted free agents, part two</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/01/19/offseason-to-do-list-green-bays-restricted-free-agents-part-two/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/01/19/offseason-to-do-list-green-bays-restricted-free-agents-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers Free Agency News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari Bigby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cullen Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarrett Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Spitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Kapinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Jolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Pickett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Moll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tramon Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is part two of our look at Green Bay&#8217;s restricted free agents.</p>
<p>No long-ass intros needed for this one.</p>
<p>Again, enjoy.</p>

Free safety Nick Colllins &#8211; Collins made $3.148 million last season in the last year of his rookie contract (some various incentives kicked in, thus the high salary). Of all the various scenarios regarding the team&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is part two of our look at Green Bay&#8217;s restricted free agents.</p>
<p>No long-ass intros needed for this one.</p>
<p>Again, enjoy.</p>
<ul>
<li>Free safety Nick Colllins &#8211; Collins made $3.148 million last season in the last year of his rookie contract (some various incentives kicked in, thus the high salary). Of all the various scenarios regarding the team&#8217;s free agents, the one involving Collins is perhaps the strangest. After a rough start in the 3-4 scheme, Collins really flourished in the second half of the year. He finished with six interceptions, giving him 13 for the past two seasons. He&#8217;s been voted to each of the past two Pro Bowls and, at 26 (he turns 27 in August), he seems to be just now entering his prime. Plus, he&#8217;s a Ted Thompson guy and Teddy usually takes care of his guys. Yet, there seemingly has been no progress made on a new deal and no one quite knows why. There aren&#8217;t a ton of guys in the league who can do what Collins does, so Thompson needs to get going. With Collins&#8217; past quotes, you have to think he&#8217;ll hold out if a tender is all he gets from the team. That can&#8217;t happen. Verdict: Forget the tenders and sign Collins to a six-year contract</li>
<p><span id="more-1457"></span></p>
<li>Defensive end Johnny Jolly &#8211; Jolly made just under $560,000 last season in the last year of his rooke contract. Oh, Johnny. You frustrate me so. Some times you&#8217;re great and you take over games. Heck, you batted down 11 passes this season, a club record. But sometimes you take dumb penalties (see: the headbutt in the second Vikings game) and disappear from games. You also have that little drug arrest thing still pending. If you could ever pull it all together, you could be very, very good. I&#8217;m not sure if you will, but I do think you should be brought back. A return of you and Ryan Pickett, plus B.J. Raji, Cullen Jenkins and maybe one more new guy could make for a very good d-line next season. Verdict: Tender Jolly at the second-round level</li>
<li>Punter Jeremy Kapinos &#8211; Kapinos made just over $391,000 last season. He is an Exclusive Rights Free Agent, meaning once the Packers extend him a tender, he can not negotiate with any other team. He then has to sign his tender or sit out the season. No matter either way here as Kapinos was pretty bad this past season. He was 16th in average punt distance (43.8 yards per) but amongst the worst in punts inside the 20 and inside the 10. He was also near the top in touchbacks, meaning he&#8217;s not great at angling his kicks. Field position can mean a lot and he does little to help the Pack there. I know us Greeks are supposed to stick together, but on this one I just can&#8217;t. A new punter is needed. Verdict: Shake hands, thank him for his service and send him on his way</li>
<li>Strong safety Derrick Martin &#8211; Martin made $535,000 last season in the last year of his rookie contract. At first, no one could figure out why Thompson traded for him (although it did rid us of Tony Moll, a good thing indeed). Martin stunk as a safety when Atari Bigby was hurt earlier in the season. Then we saw him play special teams and it started to make sense. Martin was a monster in that area. That said, to tender him at any level would equal a large pay increase for a guy who basically does one thing well. And since that thing is covering kicks and punts, he&#8217;s expendable. Verdict: Shake hands, thank him for his service and send him on his way</li>
<li>Center Jason Spitz &#8211; Spitz made $1.792 million last season in the last year of his rookie contract. This past season was supposed to be the year Spitz broke out. The starting center job was his and he was going to anchor the line for the foreseeable future. Then the season started. Spitz was merely average before hurting his back and being put on injured reserve midway through the season. Then, he had to sit and watch as Scott Wells was basically fantastic at center, essentially re-claming his spot for the future. Spitz could still have a future, maybe at left guard, provided his back heals. Either way, he&#8217;d provide solid value, even if it&#8217;s just as a backup. Verdict: Tender Spitz at the low level, in this case a third-round level</li>
<li>Cornerback Tramon Williams &#8211; Williams made just under $906,000 last season on an Exclusive Rights Free Agent tender. He&#8217;ll fall under that category again this season, meaning the Packers should be able to keep him away from other teams. This time, though, they should focus on a long-term deal. Williams was good again last season &#8211; first as a nickelback and then as a starter once Al Harris went down for the year. He picked off four passes &#8211; giving him nine for the past two seasons &#8211; and defended 15 more. He&#8217;s a bit too aggressive at times and draws his share of penalties, but he improved in both those areas this season. Harris and Charles &#8220;Defensive Player of the Year&#8221; Woodson are both well past 30 and, outside of Williams, the team doesn&#8217;t have much of a future at the position as of now. But the Packers have Williams, who turns 27 in March, and they need to make sure it stays that way. Verdict: Forget the tenders and sign Williams to a four-year contract</li>
<li>Running back DeShawn Wynn &#8211; Wynn made just over $490,000 last season on a one-year contract. Like Kapinos and Williams, he is an Exclusive Rights Free Agent. Somehow it&#8217;s fitting that this list would end with Wynn, nicknamed &#8220;DeShawn Wimp&#8221; by some fans - not me&#8230;I would NEVER use such a nickname - because of his inability to stay healthy. Wynn made us hopeful that he could, maybe, do <em>something</em> this past season as he had a solid training camp. Once again, though, Wynn only played a handful of snaps in a handful of games before going on I.R. with a knee injury. At some point, the Wynn saga has to end, doesn&#8217;t it? What better time than now, right? Verdict: Shake hands, thank him for his service and send him on his way</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s all for our look at Green Bay&#8217;s restricted free agents. Tomorrow we&#8217;ll be looking at some players under contract who could be released. All I&#8217;m going to say for now is: Jarrett Bush, be very nervous.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/01/19/offseason-to-do-list-green-bays-restricted-free-agents-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday wrap-up: Green signs (and other notes)</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/22/wednesday-wrap-up-green-signs-and-other-notes/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/22/wednesday-wrap-up-green-signs-and-other-notes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahman Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Clifton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic Rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Spitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korey Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Lumpkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Lang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What was rumored Tuesday became official Wednesday.</p>
<p>Ahman Green is a Green Bay Packer once again.</p>
<p>Green signed a one-year deal with the team. Terms were not disclosed. Green and former Indianapolis Colts running back Dominic Rhodes both worked out for the team Monday.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a column expanding my thoughts on the Green signing later today, so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was rumored Tuesday became official Wednesday.</p>
<p>Ahman Green is a Green Bay Packer once again.</p>
<p>Green signed a one-year deal with the team. Terms were not disclosed. Green and former Indianapolis Colts running back Dominic Rhodes both worked out for the team Monday.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a column expanding my thoughts on the Green signing later today, so make sure to check back. But for today, let&#8217;s focus on what this means for the Packers running back situation:</p>
<ul><span id="more-1082"></span></p>
<li>First, the biggest reason for Green&#8217;s signing comes in the form of DeShawn Wynn once again going on injured reserve. Head coach Mike McCarthy announced that Wynn had season-ending knee surgery. That likely marks the end of Wynn&#8217;s time in Green Bay. Wynn showed flashes of talent throughout his two-plus seasons with the Packers. But he could never stay healthy, missing 22 of a possible 37 (through this past Sunday) regular season games due to injury.</li>
<li>What does this mean for Kregg Lumpkin? After all, Lumpkin was sitting there on the team&#8217;s practice squad, just waiting to get the call in the event someone got hurt. Well, someone got hurt. And he didn&#8217;t get called. Instead, the team went with a 32-year old running back who has missed much of the past two-plus seasons due to injury. Yes, Lumpkin has had some trouble staying healthy as well (spending most of last season on I.R., for example). But he&#8217;s a lot younger and if the team liked him as much as it claimed, how come he didn&#8217;t get signed? You have to wonder.</li>
<li>Green met with the media today and, <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/65270567.html">to hear him tell it</a>, it doesn&#8217;t sound like he&#8217;ll be ready for Cleveland this week. It will be interesting to see how things shake out once he is ready. McCarthy usually only activates two running backs per week. With Ryan Grant and Brandon Jackson already in the fold, will Green be battling Jackson for the backup spot? Will McCarthy activate three backs now?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Injury update</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong>An injury update, courtesy of the <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/65190747.html">Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</a>:</p>
<p>A handful of Packers missed practice today, most notably left tackle Chad Clifton. Clifton re-aggrivated his right ankle injury against the Lions. It&#8217;s unknown whether he&#8217;ll go this week. Personally, I&#8217;d hold him out and give T.J. Lang a shot. The team liked how he looked against the Vikings and the Browns would provide a good chance to get his feet wet against an inferior opponent. Plus, with four penalties against the Lions, you have to wonder if Clifton is reaching the end.</p>
<p>Jason Spitz missed practice with his ailing back that caused him to sit out the Lions game. I have a feeling he might not play this week. Again, it&#8217;s Cleveland. Scott Wells can handle the center duties for this one. He needs to be ready for the Vikings game.</p>
<p>Jordy Nelson (knee) was out. Not a surprise, though, as it sounds like he&#8217;ll miss at least a couple weeks. James Jones &#8211; this is your shot to grab hold of the No. 3 receiver spot. Take it.</p>
<p>A pair of fullbacks, Korey Hall (knee) and Quinn Johnson (unknown), were both out today. Who&#8217;s laughing about keeping three fullbacks now, huh? All kidding aside, I am worried a bit about Hall. He&#8217;s been hurt for awhile now.</p>
<p><strong>Thoughts on Mayor Schmitt&#8217;s idea</strong><br />
You might have noticed we haven&#8217;t run any reaction to Mayor Jim Schmitt&#8217;s idea that the town of Green Bay should welcome back Judas in a classy manner when he returns for the Nov. 1 contest at Lambeau Field.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why: Schmitt is just another pandering idiot politician &#8211; wait, aren&#8217;t they all? &#8211; who is trying to drum up support that he can then use for re-election, whenever that might be.</p>
<p>Screw your idea and screw you, Jim. No mercy.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/22/wednesday-wrap-up-green-signs-and-other-notes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No S-Jax? What a shame</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/20/no-s-jax-what-a-shame/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/20/no-s-jax-what-a-shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahman Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dominic Rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, the trade deadline has come and gone and it took any hopes of the Green Bay Packers getting Steven Jackson with it.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really hold out much hope that Green Bay would pull this deal off. In fact, it was more wishful thinking that anything else. Jackson&#8217;s too good and, at 26, probably too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the trade deadline has come and gone and it took any hopes of the Green Bay Packers getting Steven Jackson with it.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really hold out much hope that Green Bay would pull this deal off. In fact, it was more wishful thinking that anything else. Jackson&#8217;s too good and, at 26, probably too young to be traded. Still, it would have been nice to see, right?</p>
<p>That said, I kind of thought Ted Thompson would do something today. Maybe pick up a mid-level veteran offensive lineman or something. But, alas, no dice.</p>
<p>It was rumored earlier in the day that the team had reached agreement with free agent Ahman Green. The Packers had worked out Green, along with former Colts running back Dominic Rhodes, on Monday.</p>
<p>That rumor was later proven to be untrue, however. Frankly, I can&#8217;t even see why Green Bay would consider it.</p>
<p>I know Ryan Grant&#8217;s been disappointing and DeShawn Wynn and Brandon Jackson have been hurt and/or awful, but why Green? He&#8217;s got to have nothing left in the tank, right?</p>
<p>At least Rhodes was decent for Indianapolis at times last season. More than I can say about Green.</p>
<p>Teddy, you once again leave me totally dumbfounded.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/10/20/no-s-jax-what-a-shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday wrap-up</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/28/monday-wrap-up-2/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/28/monday-wrap-up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mike McCarthy can be stubborn. We all know that.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s time the Green Bay Packers&#8217; head coach wises up and ditches the idea that Ryan Grant can be an inside-the-tackles runner.</p>
<p>Too many times, particularly in Sunday&#8217;s 36-17 win over the St. Louis Rams, McCarthy had Grant running the ball right into the middle of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike McCarthy can be stubborn. We all know that.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s time the Green Bay Packers&#8217; head coach wises up and ditches the idea that Ryan Grant can be an inside-the-tackles runner.</p>
<p>Too many times, particularly in Sunday&#8217;s 36-17 win over the St. Louis Rams, McCarthy had Grant running the ball right into the middle of the line. I know, with the zone-blocking scheme, the plan is for Grant to get his cutback lane, plant his foot and go.</p>
<p>But the cutback lanes simply aren&#8217;t there. And it&#8217;s not looking like they&#8217;re going to develop any time soon. The result of them lacking is Grant running the ball into a pile for an awful one-or-two yard gain.<br />
<span id="more-1006"></span><br />
Not only that, but the pounding Grant will take in those collisions is likely going to lead to an injury at some point.</p>
<p>The Packers have got to start focusing on getting Grant outside the tackles. That&#8217;s where he shines. That was obvious Sunday as every time Grant got outside, he was picking up at least solid yardage. Plus, he&#8217;s not the most punishing runner, so getting him outside will lead to more matchups with corners and safeties &#8211; the types of players Grant could overwhelm.</p>
<p>Let DeShawn Wynn or (when finally healthy) Brandon Jackson handle the inside duties and put Grant in a position where he can fully display his game-breaking talents.</p>
<p><strong>Packers catch a case of the dropsies</strong></p>
<p>For all the talent at the receiver position, the Packers sure are having trouble hanging on to the damn ball, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>The Packers dropped at least two more passes Sunday &#8211; one by James Jones and one by Jordy Nelson. I&#8217;m not even sure how many that makes for the season; suffice to say, it&#8217;s been far more than any of us expected.</p>
<p>Both drops against the Rams were inexcusable as they came on passes that, if you&#8217;re an NFL receiver, you have to catch.</p>
<p>Nelson is starting to become troublesome. He&#8217;s dropped at least three passes this season, by my count, and doesn&#8217;t seem to have the same confidence he had as last season went on.</p>
<p>Jones continues to show why, with all his talent, he&#8217;s stuck in the No. 3 receiver spot. He can make the big play from time-to-time, but struggles with being a consistent pass catcher. That&#8217;s got to improve if he&#8217;s ever going to fully realize his abilities.</p>
<p><strong>RAJI TIME!!</strong></p>
<p>Finally &#8211; finally &#8211; we saw the debut of first-round pick B.J. Raji (RAJI!) on Sunday.</p>
<p>Raji played a handful of snaps, mostly at defensive end.</p>
<p>He looked like I thought he would (i.e., rusty) as he failed to record any defensive statistics. Still, he showed good power on a couple of plays and did draw a holding penalty at one point.</p>
<p>Most importantly, he was able to get his feet wet before the game against the Queens next Monday night. Hopefully, his ankle didn&#8217;t suffer any further injury and he&#8217;ll be more game ready next time so he can make Judas&#8217; life a living hell.</p>
<p><strong>Injury update</strong></p>
<p>It sounds like the Packers, for the most part, made it out of the game fairly healthy.</p>
<p>Shocking, I know.</p>
<p>Greg Jennings did some further damage to his already injured wrist but was able to return. Sounds like he&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Same goes for Jones, who suffered a dislocated finger. He was also able to return.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/28/monday-wrap-up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Packers look, position-by-position, on offense</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/07/how-the-packers-look-position-by-position-on-offense/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/07/how-the-packers-look-position-by-position-on-offense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen Barbre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breno Giacomini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Swain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Clifton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryn Colledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evan Dietrich-Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Spitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kuhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Sitton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korey Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Wells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Havner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Lang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Packers have their 53-man roster set for the 2009 season, we wanted to take a look at the team, position-by-position, and give our thoughts on how the Pack really looks.</p>
<p>After all, we&#8217;re now less than a week away from the season opener.</p>
<p>I wanted to do this as one post, but it ended [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Packers have their 53-man roster set for the 2009 season, we wanted to take a look at the team, position-by-position, and give our thoughts on how the Pack really looks.</p>
<p>After all, we&#8217;re now less than a week away from the season opener.</p>
<p>I wanted to do this as one post, but it ended up being too much. So I decided to split things up into offense and defense/special teams. This is part one; part two will be up later today.</p>
<p>Labor Day? Day off? We at OBOD don&#8217;t know the meaning of the words.</p>
<p><strong>Quarterback (2)</strong></p>
<p>Starter: Aaron Rodgers</p>
<p>Backup: Matt Flynn</p>
<p>A position of strength, strictly because of Rodgers&#8217; presence. The man some call A-Rodg is primed to break out with a huge second season as full-time starter as he is now fully out of Judas&#8217; shadow. In fact, I&#8217;d say Judas now has to prove he&#8217;s as good as Rodgers.</p>
<p>If Rodgers goes down, though, this team is in a world of trouble. That&#8217;s not to say Flynn isn&#8217;t getting better and won&#8217;t someday become a solid backup, because he will. It&#8217;s just that Flynn isn&#8217;t ready to lead a team.</p>
<p><strong>Running back (3)</strong></p>
<p>Starter: Ryan Grant</p>
<p>Backups: Brandon Jackson, DeShawn Wynn</p>
<p>This group is good but not without some question marks.</p>
<p>Grant bounced back after injuries slowed him down for the first half of the season. I am pretty confident that will carry over to this season. The Packers being a more physical run-blocking team will also help.</p>
<p>Jackson is entering a crucial year. He has to show just why the team used a second round pick on him in 2007. He&#8217;s already hurt and might miss the season opener, so he&#8217;s not off to a good start. Wynn is definitely talented. If he stays healthy, he could easily surpass Jackson for the No. 2 spot. With Wynn, though, that&#8217;s a big if.</p>
<p><strong>Fullback (3)</strong></p>
<p>Starter: John Kuhn</p>
<p>Backups: Korey Hall, Quinn Johnson</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t think the team was serious about keeping three fullbacks, but it looks like it is. All three bring a little something different to the table and the group is solid.</p>
<p>Kuhn is a more traditional fullback. He&#8217;s a solid blocker and occasional short-yardage and goalline back.</p>
<p>Hall is a good pass catcher and has gotten better as a blocker. Johnson is likely the fullback of the future and is a potentially punishing run blocker.</p>
<p><strong>Wide receiver (5)</strong></p>
<p>Starters: Greg Jennings, Donald Driver</p>
<p>Backups: James Jones, Jordy Nelson, Brett Swain</p>
<p>Arguably the best group of wideouts in the league, in terms of both talent and depth. Jennings has his new contract and will get even better, taking his place amongst the best in the league. On most teams, Driver is a No. 1 receiver. Yes, Driver is 34 but he plays like he&#8217;s 24.</p>
<p>Jones, if healthy, is a major playmaker and Nelson should build on his solid rookie season. Swain replaces Ruvell Martin and will bring athleticism that Martin lacked a bit.</p>
<p><strong>Tight end (3)</strong></p>
<p>Starter: Donald Lee</p>
<p>Backups: Jermichael Finley, Spencer Havner</p>
<p>What is now a very solid group has potential to be even better.</p>
<p>Lee is a good, if unspectacular, tight end. His numbers dipped a bit last year but should improve.</p>
<p>Finley is a freak, athletically, and will provide the Packers with a consistent red zone receiving option they&#8217;ve lacked in recent years. He&#8217;s ready to bust out, big-time. Havner is more of a pure blocking tight end and won&#8217;t provide much as a receiver.</p>
<p><strong>Offensive line (9)</strong></p>
<p>Starters: Chad Clifton, Daryn Colledge, Jason Spitz, Josh Sitton, Allen Barbre</p>
<p>Backups: T.J. Lang, Scott Wells, Evan Dietrich-Smith, Breno Giacomini</p>
<p>Overall, I think the starters will be better than most think. Certainly, they&#8217;ll be more physical.</p>
<p>Clifton is aging, not as good as he once was and entering the final year of his contract. But, if healthy, he is still solid. Colledge was maybe the team&#8217;s most consistent o-lineman last year and should get even better. Spitz has a ton of talent but is still new to the position. Sitton is a nasty S.O.B. who has upside if healthy. Barbre is even nastier and will show why the team spent two years grooming him.</p>
<p>The backups, outside of Wells, are young and fairly inexperienced so the starters need to stay healthy.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/07/how-the-packers-look-position-by-position-on-offense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backfield overload?</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/04/backfield-overload/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/04/backfield-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adam Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kuhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korey Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Lumpkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrell Sutton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We all know the roster has to be trimmed to 53 by Saturday.  Some cuts will be a lot easier than others and some players are already destined to the practice squad.  The one position that remains muddled is running back.  Last year the Packers started the season with five backs &#8211; Ryan Grant, Brandon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the roster has to be trimmed to 53 by Saturday.  Some cuts will be a lot easier than others and some players are already destined to the practice squad.  The one position that remains muddled is running back.  Last year the Packers started the season with five backs &#8211; Ryan Grant, Brandon Jackson, Kregg Lumpkin, Korey Hall and John Kuhn.  It is hard to imagine them keeping more than five this season, but not out of the realm of possibilities.</p>
<p>Ryan Grant and Brandon Jackson are the only two backs set in stone.  So now you have Kregg Lumpkin, who opened as the team&#8217;s #3 halfback last season, Tyrell Sutton, DeShawn Wynn, Korey Hall, John Kuhn and Quinn Johnson fighting for essentially three, maybe four spots.</p>
<p>Ironically, despite having his spot wrapped up, Jackson has a large role in who makes the team.  Unsure how serious his ankle injury is, the team may have to keep four halfbacks.  Jackson won&#8217;t be put on IR, but if he can&#8217;t go against Chicago, the Packers won&#8217;t enter the game with only one true backup for Grant.</p>
<p>Out of the three remaining halfbacks, I think Sutton has proved the most and will be on the final roster.  One big reason is that he won&#8217;t clear waivers to make the practice squad.  Greg A. Bedard of the Journal Sentinel has brought this up as well and with Kevin Jones getting banged up for the Bears last night and the Lions with little behind Kevin Smith, Sutton may even be picked up within the division.  That is something McCarthy and Thompson would never let happen.</p>
<p>So Sutton is in.  The next likely guy to survive the cuts is Quinn Johnson.  Has he been more productive than Hall or Kuhn?  Not really.  Has he played starred on special teams?  Not as much as the other two.  But the team did invest a fairly high pick on him and his ceiling is a lot higher than either Hall or Kuhn.  Bedard said it best last night in his live blog, &#8220;<span id="txt35179097">Are you getting that much at a fringe position where you can&#8217;t afford to keep Johnson? I doubt that.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span id="txt35179097">He hasn&#8217;t been awful and it is not like Hall and Kuhn have lit the world on fire.  There are maybe a handful of elite fullbacks in the NFL and the Packers don&#8217;t have one of them.  So, Johnson gets the nod because of his potential and the sheer power and strength he has over Hall and Kuhn.</span></p>
<p><span>Last night was critical for DeShawn Wynn and Kregg Lumpkin.  I am not a big fan at all of having four preseason games, but for guys playing for their jobs and in some cases their careers, it is huge.  Let&#8217;s look at the numbers &#8211; Lumpkin 9 carries, 34 yards and 1 touchdown.  Wynn- 6 carries, 11 yards, zero touchdowns.  I am not saying a final decision should be made off of one game, but it can be a factor.  I think Lumpkin has more value on special teams than Wynn and may have more pure talent.  Did you know coming out of high school he was the #2 rated running back only behind Reggie Bush?  Neither did I.</span></p>
<p><span>Hall and Kuhn are as equal as they come and there is no way the team keeps three fullbacks.  I&#8217;ll make this simple Hall is younger and cheaper after the team tendered Kuhn this offseason ($1.01 million).  Roster cuts is a numbers game and sometimes the most important number is money. </span></p>
<p><span>So with Grant, Jackson, Sutton, Johnson and Hall in the fold, do the Packers keep a fourth halfback in Lumpkin?  I think they do, mainly because of Jackson&#8217;s injury.  The team might look to trade Wynn and/or Kuhn, but will end up having to cut them.  That is just the nature of the business.  Remember running back in the most replaceable position in the NFL, with backs coming from nowhere to shine (i.e. Grant and Samkon Gado).  One thing to look out for is the possibility of only keeping one fullback now or down the road when Jackson gets to 100%.  It looks like more and more everyday Spencer Havner will make the roster and could see some time in a reserve role at fullback.</span></p>
<p><span>We&#8217;ll find out by 5 p.m. tomorrow.</span></p>
<p><span><em>-Adam Somers</em><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/04/backfield-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>These five have something to prove</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/01/these-five-have-something-to-prove/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/01/these-five-have-something-to-prove/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari Bigby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dom Capers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Jolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrell Sutton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Packers have looked outstanding during the preseason and the upcoming season should be a good one.</p>
<p>Still, there are some players on the roster who need to use 2009 to prove that they belong on the team for the foreseeable future &#8211; by my count, five.</p>
<p>And here they are:</p>
<p>5. Donald Lee, tight end</p>
<p>Lee has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Packers have looked outstanding during the preseason and the upcoming season should be a good one.</p>
<p>Still, there are some players on the roster who need to use 2009 to prove that they belong on the team for the foreseeable future &#8211; by my count, five.</p>
<p>And here they are:</p>
<p><strong>5. Donald Lee, tight end</strong></p>
<p>Lee has been a very solid, sturdy receiving option throughout his time in Green Bay. He found particular success with Judas as quarterback, recording 48 catches for 575 yards and six touchdowns in 2007, for example. His numbers dipped last season, however, with Aaron Rodgers as quarterback (nine less catches and 272 less yards). They&#8217;ve dipped even more so this preseason (just three catches for 25 yards) as Rodgers seems to be favoring Jermichael Finley (nine catches, 92 yards, two touchdowns). Lee&#8217;s been named the starter for this season, but with a $2 million salary for 2010, he&#8217;ll have to put up improved numbers to warrant paying a No. 2 tight end &#8211; which he will be at some point soon &#8211; that kind of dough.</p>
<p><strong>4. Johnny Jolly, defensive end</strong></p>
<p>When Jolly is in a nice rotation, he can be damn near unstoppable (see: much of the 2007 season). However, 2008 was definitely a down year for him. I wonder how much his shoulder injury from 2007 played a part in that (remember, his shoulder got shredded late in the regular season). He&#8217;s reverted back to his 2007 form during the preseason, which is nice to see. He&#8217;s in a contract year, so I think we will see more of that Jolly this season. For his sake, that better be the case because, for a player with as many character concerns as he has, he has to be great to warrant being paid big-time money.</p>
<p><strong>3. Atari Bigby, strong safety</strong></p>
<p>Bigby is in a similar situation as Jolly. He was fantastic in 2007, with 86 tackles, five interceptions and three forced fumbles in 16 games. Then came an injury-plagued 2008 season where he recorded just 21 tackles and one interception in seven games. While I thought the new scheme would be a perfect fit for a player with his skill set (physical, good blitzer, solid in coverage), it doesn&#8217;t sound like he&#8217;s been all that great in camp. He&#8217;s got the starting job locked up, but Anthony Smith has probably outplayed him in camp so you wonder how long the team will wait on Bigby to make the transition. He, like Jolly, is in a contract year, so he needs to step up big-time to prove he isn&#8217;t a flash-in-the-pan.</p>
<p><strong>2. Brandon Jackson, running back</strong></p>
<p>Jackson has shown some flashes of ability over the course of his first two seasons with the team. He&#8217;s a solid pass-catcher who can sometimes be effective with his rolling-stone, bowling-ball style of running. The problem is that he just hasn&#8217;t done enough to justify the fact that he was a second round pick in 2007. A lot of that has to do with Ryan Grant&#8217;s emergence, this is true. But even when Jackson&#8217;s had chances to make a name for himself &#8211; like the first quarter of &#8216;07 before Grant busted out or early last season when Grant was hurt/struggling &#8211; he just hasn&#8217;t been able to do so. The backup running back job will be his again this year, but it looks like he might not be ready for the start of the season with a sprained ankle. Combine that with players like DeShawn Wynn and Tyrell Sutton nipping at his heels and Jackson really has to have a good season to warrant keeping him around for 2010.</p>
<p><strong>1. A.J. Hawk, inside linebacker</strong></p>
<p>Remember when Hawk was the No. 5 pick of the 2006 draft and we all thought we had a real difference-making linebacker for the next 10 years? Man, I miss those days. The argument I hear from a lot of Hawk supporters is, &#8220;Well, he hasn&#8217;t been terrible. He&#8217;s been solid.&#8221; Yeah, he has, for the most part. But the fifth overall pick should not be &#8220;solid.&#8221; He should be outstanding &#8211; the type of player who can anchor a defense. Hawk has not been that player, by any stretch. Actually, outside of the final eight games or so of his rookie year, I&#8217;d say Hawk has been a real disappointment. He struggles in coverage, has consistently failed at achieving the proper pad level and makes too many tackles downfield. Granted, he spent his first three seasons playing in Vanilla Bob Sanders&#8217; scheme. Now, though, he&#8217;s playing for a truly creative d-coordinator in Dom Capers who will know how to put Hawk in positions to succeed. It&#8217;s up to Hawk to do so, because with a $4.1 million salary for 2010 (and a whopping $10 million salary in 2011), the bust clock is absolutely ticking.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/01/these-five-have-something-to-prove/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friendly fire: Update edition, part one</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/28/friendly-fire-update-edition-part-one/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/28/friendly-fire-update-edition-part-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Brohm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kuhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korey Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Lumpkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrell Sutton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(I wish we could utilize sound effects on this site, because I&#8217;d totally begin this post with the ultra-creepy &#8220;Update&#8221; music that used to run on &#8220;Unsolved Mysteries&#8221; whenever a criminal was caught or mystery was, in fact, solved. You remember, right? The music that should have made you feel better because something good had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I wish we could utilize sound effects on this site, because I&#8217;d totally begin this post with the ultra-creepy &#8220;Update&#8221; music that used to run on &#8220;Unsolved Mysteries&#8221; whenever a criminal was caught or mystery was, in fact, solved. You remember, right? The music that should have made you feel better because something good had happened &#8211; a mystery had been solved, after all &#8211; but never did because it was so intense? I&#8217;m in my late 20s and that music still scares the hell out of me. Okay, anyways&#8230;)</p>
<p>Back in late July, we ran a four-part series &#8211; the archived versions of which can be found <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/07/28/friendly-fire-training-camp-battles-part-one/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a>, <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/07/31/friendly-fire-training-camp-battles-part-two/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a>, <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/07/31/friendly-fire-training-camp-battles-part-three/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a> and <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/08/02/friendly-fire-training-camp-battles-part-four/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">here</a> &#8211; in which we broke down the 10 major position battles on the Packers heading into training camp.</p>
<p>With two preseason games and over 20 practices now in the books &#8211; and preseason game three against Arizona set for tonight at 9 p.m. Lambeau Time &#8211; it seemed like a good time to check in on how these battles are going.</p>
<p>Monday, three were decided as head coach Mike McCarthy announced his starting offensive line for the season. The battles for center, right guard and right tackle, respectively, had been three of the most important heading into camp. And just for the record, yours truly predicted the correct outcome for all three.</p>
<p>That still leaves seven battles where a winner has yet to be announced.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how they&#8217;re going so far. This is part one; part two will be up later today.</p>
<p><strong>Backup Quarterback</strong></p>
<p><strong>The pre-camp pick: </strong>Matt Flynn over Brian Brohm</p>
<p><strong>What I wrote then: </strong>&#8220;Flynn has the job for now and the guess here is that he keeps it. Too many question marks surround Brohm and it’s hard to see enough of them getting cleared up in one camp.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Where we are now</strong>: That this was even considered a battle seems downright silly now. Flynn is quickly turning into a solid, if unspectacular, backup. He&#8217;s got solid command of the huddle and can make plays happen if things breakdown. McCarthy has done a nice job grooming him.</p>
<p>Brohm, on the other hand, has been nothing short of a train wreck. He has repeatedly shown he can&#8217;t deal with pressure, has poor foot work and lacks confidence. His arm is also not as strong as many thought before the 2008 draft. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s in any danger of being cut &#8211; he was a second-round pick just over a year ago, remember &#8211; but he has about a million miles to go if he ever wants to turn into an NFL quarterback.</p>
<p><strong>No. 3 running back</strong></p>
<p><strong>The pre-camp pick: </strong>DeShawn Wynn over Kregg Lumpkin</p>
<p><strong>What I wrote then: </strong>&#8220;It’s hard to imagine (Lumpkin) surprising people like he did last year. Talent usually wins out in the end and, while this battle is still tough to call, for now Wynn looks like the early favorite.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Where we are now:</strong> I only included Wynn and Lumpkin in the original battle.</p>
<p>Yeah, Tyrell Sutton was on the roster and I had heard of him (he played at Northwestern and I&#8217;m a graduate of the University of Minnesota&#8230;save your digs, Badgers fans; we know we you&#8217;re better than us in pretty much every sport), but he was an undrafted free agent. What chance did he have of doing anything?</p>
<p>As it turns out, a pretty good one.</p>
<p>Sutton has been the biggest surprise of camp. He&#8217;s looked sharp throughout the practices and even better in the games, racking up 140 yards and a touchdown on 27 carries in two games. Yes, it&#8217;s against third-stringers. But if a guy can run, a guy can run.</p>
<p>Wynn looked really good at first before suffering a knee injury that set him back a bit. He&#8217;s rebounded though and is still very much in the running.</p>
<p>Lumpkin hasn&#8217;t been quite as good as he was last camp &#8211; but he still hasn&#8217;t been bad. He also got hurt for a minute with a shoulder sprain before coming back.</p>
<p>This is still very much a three-horse race and, if all three continue this way, there&#8217;s a real chance the Packers keep two of the three on the roster. For now, I&#8217;ll stick with my original theory that Wynn takes the job.</p>
<p><strong>Fullback</strong></p>
<p><strong>The pre-camp pick: </strong>Korey Hall and Quinn Johnson make the roster; John Kuhn does not</p>
<p><strong>What I wrote then:</strong> &#8220;The team will only keep two fullbacks, meaning the loser is out of a job. That player will likely be Kuhn. Green Bay will keep Hall for his pass-catching and Johnson for his punishing run-blocking.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Where we are now: </strong>Quinn Johnson has been one of the more interesting stories in camp. Coming into camp, he looked like one of the draft&#8217;s biggest steals. Then he struggled, looking tentative and confused. Now, he&#8217;s bounced back and is starting to show flashes of his true battering-ram self. He could play a bigger part in the Packers being a more physical running team this season.</p>
<p>Hall and Kuhn have pretty much been what we thought they&#8217;d be before camp started. Hall is more of a weapon in the passing game while Kuhn is more of a traditional blocker. Hall, however, seems to have improved as a blocker whereas Kuhn has been about the same as a pass-catcher.</p>
<p>I still feel fairly confident in my original theory, so I&#8217;m going to stick with it. Johnson is a lock to make the roster and Hall, with his improved blocking skills, edges out Kuhn.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/28/friendly-fire-update-edition-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preseason game one vs. Cleveland: A smashing start</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/16/preseason-game-one-vs-cleveland-a-smashing-start/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/16/preseason-game-one-vs-cleveland-a-smashing-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady Poppinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Brohm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Peprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeShawn Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desmond Bishop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joshua Cribbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Lumpkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mason Crosby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Moll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tramon Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyrell Sutton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Blackmon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Saturday night, we began to see just what kind of team the Green Bay Packers might be this season.</p>
<p>There were a lot of signs that the Pack could be pretty damn good as they blanked the Cleveland Browns 17-0 at Lambeau Field.</p>
<p>Still, there were some areas that were cringe-worthy (for the first preseason game, anyways).</p>
<p>With [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday night, we began to see just what kind of team the Green Bay Packers might be this season.</p>
<p>There were a lot of signs that the Pack could be pretty damn good as they blanked the Cleveland Browns 17-0 at Lambeau Field.</p>
<p>Still, there were some areas that were cringe-worthy (for the first preseason game, anyways).</p>
<p>With respect to the great Clint Eastwood, here were the good, the bad and the ugly from the evening:</p>
<p><strong>The Good</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Aaron Rodgers. Not much has been written of Rodgers&#8217; actual showings so far in camp, as far as I know, so I was interested to see how he would look in his first actual game action. Rodgers showed that he is still very much on-track to becoming a top-level quarterback, going 5-for-10 for for 102 yards, one touchdown and no picks. His touchdown was a thing of beauty, too, a 53-yard strike to Donald Driver that Rodgers threw while on the move to his left.</li>
<li>The running game. The five Green Bay running backs totaled 44 carries for 231 yards with all the backs averaging at least 3.8 yards a carry (DeShawn Wynn had that low number). Ryan Grant looked solid, running six times for 28 yards and a two-yard score, as did Kregg Lumpkin (eight carries, 48 yards) and Brandon Jackson (8 carries, 41 yards). The real surprise was Tyrell Sutton. The undrafted rookie out of Northwestern ran 16 times for 91 yards, albeit late in the game. He&#8217;s looked solid in camp thus far and, apparently, is making it a three-back race for the No. 3 RB spot. Can the Pack actually keep four backs? I wouldn&#8217;t have thought so before, but maybe now. One thing&#8217;s becoming very clear: At least one talented runner will be available for another team at the end of camp. That running dominance led to a nearly 20-minute difference in time of possession for the Pack, as well.</li>
<li>James Jones. Three catches for 43 yards, with some nifty moves along the way. If Jones can stay healthy, he will be the No. 3 wide receiver as he is dominating Jordy Nelson in the battle for that spot.</li>
<li>The defensive backs. This figured to be the strength of the defense at the start of camp and, so far, so good. The DBs picked off three passes, with the INTs going to Charlie Peprah, Tramon Williams and Anthony Smith. They looked good when called upon to blitz for the most part as Smith and Will Blackmon had sacks with Blackmon also forcing a fumble. The latter is key as DBs blitz fairly often in the new scheme. This was all accomplished without Charles Woodson and Al Harris, both of whom were healthy scratches.</li>
<li>Desmond Bishop. Bishop has been wreaking havoc in camp so far and that translated into a strong showing against the Browns. Four tackles, one sack, one pass defended and he was all over the field. He&#8217;s going to force this team to play him somewhere.</li>
<li>Matt Flynn. At least one Packer backup QB looked solid as Flynn went 5-of-6 for 50 yards. This team is still dead if Rodgers goes down for any extended length of time, but at least Flynn is showing signs of becoming a capable backup.</li>
<li>No major injuries. In fact, let me state that a little more clearly: NO INJURIES!! YES!!! For a team that was really hurt by injuries last preseason, Saturday night was a welcomed change.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Bad</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Mason Crosby only going 1-for-3 on field goal attempts. I know, I know, I&#8217;m probably looking too much into this, seeing as though the two he missed were from 55 and 60 yards, respectively, and the one he made was from 45 yards. Still, Crosby is going into year three and for him to become a mainstay on the roster, his accuracy has got to get better. Just being able to boom kicks doesn&#8217;t mean much.</li>
<li>Brady Poppinga and Nick Collins whiffing on containing Joshua Cribbs&#8217; 29-yard run on an end around. The Packers gave up way, way, way too many big plays last season and it looks like they&#8217;re still working that out.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Ugly</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Brian Brohm. Looks like Adam might have to <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/03/28/the-brian-brohm-conundrum/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">write a sequel to the Brian Brohm conundrum</a>. The former second-round pick went 3-of-10 for 18 yards (only 18 more than I had and I didn&#8217;t even play) with two interceptions. And that was against third-string talent. Yikes. It doesn&#8217;t appear as though he has any feel for running a pro offense, which is always a plus. That was okay last year as he was a rookie. But now? It&#8217;s a dreadful sign. After all, Flynn looks like he&#8217;s picking things up.</li>
<li>Tony Moll. Moll should get comfortable on this list; in fact, he should look into leasing a spot on this list because I get the feeling he&#8217;ll be here a lot. With an offsides call and a pressure allowed because he was, yet again, off balance (Does he have Vertigo or something? Maybe an inner-ear infection? What is wrong with him?), Moll continues to show his true mediocrity. In fact, that&#8217;s too much praise. He&#8217;s a total stiff.</li>
<li>The penalties. The Packers were the most-penalized team in the league last season and they still have a long ways to go in cleaning that up, with nine penalties for 52 yards, including four in a very short span in the first half. I like that Mike McCarthy preaches an aggressive style of play. I really do. But this has got to stop. Penalties kill success. Teams like Pittsburgh and Baltimore are also aggressive, but those teams don&#8217;t kill themselves with penalties. There&#8217;s a balance you have to find and, clearly, Green Bay isn&#8217;t anywhere near finding it.</li>
</ul>
<p>In the end, the positives far outweigh the negatives as the Packers are off to a smashing start. And if that isn&#8217;t enough to make you feel good, remember this: Woodson, Harris, Clay Matthews, Jeremy Thompson, Pat Lee, Justin Harrell and B.J. Raji (RAJI!!) didn&#8217;t even play. Enough to make any true fan smile.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/16/preseason-game-one-vs-cleveland-a-smashing-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

