<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Ol&#039; Bag of Donuts &#187; Donovan McNabb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/tag/donovan-mcnabb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com</link>
	<description>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.13" mode="simple" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Adam Somers</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Adam Somers</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com (Adam Somers)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Green Bay Packers</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Sports &amp; Recreation">
		<itunes:category text="Professional" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Ranking the injuries: Which are the worst for the Packers?</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/04/ranking-the-injuries-which-are-the-worst-for-the-packers/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/04/ranking-the-injuries-which-are-the-worst-for-the-packers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 06:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atari Bigby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady Poppinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Peprah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cullen Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desmond Bishop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dom Capers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kuhn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Jolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Neal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Pickett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=3132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We all know the Green Bay Packers are a beat-up bunch. It&#8217;s something we at OBOD have tried to steer away from as much as possible because, well, we don&#8217;t like making excuses about our team. We&#8217;re just so un-Vikings fan-ish that way.</p>
<p>So, instead of simply griping about it, I&#8217;ve decided to go a different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know the Green Bay Packers are a beat-up bunch. It&#8217;s something we at OBOD have tried to steer away from as much as possible because, well, we don&#8217;t like making excuses about our team. We&#8217;re just so un-Vikings fan-ish that way.</p>
<p>So, instead of simply griping about it, I&#8217;ve decided to go a different way. I&#8217;m going to rank the nine key players currently on the team&#8217;s injured reserve list (sadly, I left Josh Bell out). This is not a ranking of their skills, but rather their overall importance. For example, the No. 1 player listed is the player I&#8217;d most like to see healthy. I&#8217;ll also take some guesses on where each player&#8217;s future with the team stands.<br />
<span id="more-3132"></span><br />
Everyone good? Okay, here we go. As always, enjoy.</p>
<ol>
<li>Jermichael Finley, tight end (knee) - There is simply no bigger reason for the offensive struggles over the past month than the absence of No. 88. Granted, the offense wasn&#8217;t looking elite before Finley&#8217;s injury, but with him out, the field has definitely shrunk for the rest of Green Bay&#8217;s pass catchers. It&#8217;s clear the offense never had much of a plan B in the event of a Finley injury. And, most damning, Aaron Rodgers still seems lost much of the time minus his top read. Finley&#8217;s stats, projected over a full season: 84 catches, 1,204 yards, four touchdowns. He likely won&#8217;t get that fat new contract now, but should be hungrier than ever come next year.</li>
<li>Ryan Grant, running back (ankle) - It took all of about three seconds for us to downplay Grant&#8217;s importance upon hearing he was lost for the year. Eight games later, I&#8217;d like to take back much of what I said. That&#8217;s not meant to be a shot at Brandon Jackson or John Kuhn because, actually, those two have been pretty okay. But, either alone or combined, they do not bring the same threat Grant did. Grant, while certainly not an elite back, at least gave opponents something to think about when gameplanning for Green Bay&#8217;s offense. He was at least a threat to break the century mark every week. With him gone, Mike McCarthy has been allowed to fully explore the dark side of his &#8220;shotgun, five-wide&#8221; philosophy. Not a good thing. With such a big salary for next year (he could earn as much as $6 million in salary and various bonuses), you have to wonder if cheaper options won&#8217;t be explored by the team.</li>
<li>Mike Neal, defensive end (shoulder) - At first, you might snicker seeing Neal this high on the list. Don&#8217;t. Despite only playing two games before seeing his season end, Neal showed some flashes of serious potential. Stout and strong enough to play the run - and quick enough to get to the passer - Neal would have been a key cog on the d-line. His presence would have given Green Bay three dual-threat linemen (Neal, B.J. Raji and Cullen Jenkins). It also would have allowed Dom Capers to do a whole lot more mixing-and-matching, depending on the situation. In 2011: Neal, Raji, Jenkins (he&#8217;ll be re-signed, fear not), Ryan Pickett and Johnny Jolly (starting to think he&#8217;ll be back). Yes, please.</li>
<li>Nick Barnett, inside linebacker (wrist) &#8211; The emergence of Desmond Bishop and the improvement of A.J. Hawk knock Barnett a little further down the list than originally thought at the time of his injury. Still, you know those times Hawk goes too high on a tackle or gets caught out of position in coverage? Yeah, those are the times you wish Barnett was still around. And his leadership is still sort of missed, as well, though that void has been filled somewhat filled by committee (Charles Woodson, Clay Matthews, etc.). Hawk is likely gone after this season, so even with a salary approaching the $6 million range, Barnett should return.</li>
<li>Morgan Burnett, safety (knee) - Solid, if unspectacular, for the two games he played before getting hurt, it&#8217;s highly likely Burnett would just be taking his game up a notch about now. Remember, Burnett has &#8220;big-time playmaker&#8221; written all over him. Luckily, Charlie Peprah&#8217;s emergence and the impending return of Atari Bigby (could happen this week) have made up for Burnett&#8217;s loss. With Burnett solidly in the fold for the foreseeable future, it&#8217;s likely that either Bigby or Peprah will not be back come 2011.</li>
<li>Brad Jones, outside linebacker (shoulder) - Jones played his best game of the season, hands down, in the win over Minnesota. With the luck the Packers have had this year with injuries, it&#8217;s darkly fitting that his shoulder injury &#8211; problematic since camp &#8211; would flair up so bad he&#8217;d have to have surgery immediately afterwards. Jones did not provide much pressure opposite Matthews, definitely disappointing. He was good against the run, though, and his pass rushing looked to be improving before he got hurt. Finding a more proven pass rushing commodity to play opposite Matthews &#8211; thus keeping Jones in a more limited role &#8211; is definitely a possibility in the offseason.</li>
<li>Derrick Martin, safety (knee) - As we all know, Martin brings limited value as an actual safety. His true value came as Green Bay&#8217;s best special teams player. With the Packers giving up at least one big return in each of the past four games, you can see why he&#8217;s been missed. Coming off such a severe injury, his return to the team next season seems in doubt, especially when you consider Green Bay&#8217;s considerable depth at the position.</li>
<li>Justin Harrell, defensive end (knee) - Harrell would have been a key member of the rotation along the d-line as he turned in a very solid training camp. Of course, we all know what happened next, don&#8217;t we? Harrell, as always, was bitten by the injury bug, less than two quarters into the season. Harrell deserves a great deal of credit for continuing to work his way back from injury. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s just never going to happen for him in the NFL. The Packers have given him four years. They can give him no more.</li>
<li>Brady Poppinga (knee), outside linebacker &#8211; Buried on the depth chart to start the season, injuries forced Poppinga into a key role, only he didn&#8217;t last long in said role. He showed a bit more potential in the 3-4 than he did last season (example: his huge overtime sack of Donovan McNabb in the Washington game). But when you consider that he&#8217;s due over $2 million next season, it becomes clear Poppinga has probably played his last down for the Packers.</li>
</ol>
<p>What do you think of my rankings? As always, comment baby, comment!</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/04/ranking-the-injuries-which-are-the-worst-for-the-packers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most indispensable player for the 2010 Green Bay Packers is&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/02/the-most-indispensable-player-for-the-2010-green-bay-packers-is/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/02/the-most-indispensable-player-for-the-2010-green-bay-packers-is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 05:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Goode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phil Loadholt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troy Polamalu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=3128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brett Goode.</p>
<p>(Wait, wait &#8211; I got my papers mixed up there. Okay, now I&#8217;m good.)</p>
<p>Clay Matthews.</p>
<p>Now, keep in mind, I am not talking about next year or the next five years. I am strictly focusing on the remainder of this season. And, for that stretch, you will not find a more important player on Green [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett Goode.</p>
<p>(Wait, wait &#8211; I got my papers mixed up there. Okay, now I&#8217;m good.)</p>
<p>Clay Matthews.</p>
<p>Now, keep in mind, I am not talking about next year or the next five years. I am strictly focusing on the remainder of this season. And, for that stretch, you will not find a more important player on Green Bay&#8217;s roster than the long-haired, wild beast of a human being that dons jersey No. 52.</p>
<p>Do not take that as a sign of disrespect towards Aaron Rodgers. As many of you pointed out, both in our comments section and Twitter, a franchise quarterback is the most important thing a team can have in today&#8217;s NFL. No arguments on that. But a franchise quarterback alone does not equal success. Last time I checked, Phil Rivers&#8217; squad is 3-5, for example.</p>
<p>Remember, Rodgers has been on the field the entire way thus far. That includes the stretch in mid-October when things were looking awfully bleak for the Pack. Rodgers should have played better, certainly, but even if his play stayed where it was, the team would have been fine &#8211; if Matthews hadn&#8217;t hurt his problematic left hamstring, that is.<br />
<span id="more-3128"></span><br />
For the six quarters Matthews missed because of the injury &#8211; the second half at Washington and the entire Miami game &#8211; the Packers generated almost no pass rush, racking up a grand total of two sacks and little pressure. The lack of pressure was perhaps the single biggest reason Green Bay lost both games in overtime.</p>
<p>Go back to the Redskins game (a game all of OBOD had the misfortune of attending). At halftime, Green Bay was only ahead 10-3. But you figured things would be okay because Washington couldn&#8217;t generate anything offensively, namely due to the Packers&#8217; pass rush. The constant pressure Matthews &#8211; responsible for 1.5 of Green Bay&#8217;s three sacks in the half &#8211; put on Donovan McNabb had led to a brutal first half showing for the veteran, McNabb going 10-of-21 for 132 yards (52 coming on one completion). Halftime adjustments or not, you have to think Matthews could have kept that up all day. Even if he&#8217;d been shutdown, the attention he garnered would have allowed others to make plays (another thing he&#8217;s provided all season, by the way).</p>
<p>Once he left with the injury in the third quarter, though, a different story unfolded. Over the final two quarters (plus overtime), McNabb was given a great deal of time in the pocket and he made the Packers pay, going 16-of-28 for 225 yards, one touchdown and one pick. There is simply no way he puts up those numbers if Matthews stays in. As a result, you have to think Green Bay would have pulled out the win.</p>
<p>Similar story the next week at home against Miami. The Packers recorded zero sacks and, again, almost no pressure. Miami&#8217;s offensive line is much better than Washington&#8217;s, of course, so it&#8217;s hard to say Matthews would have made enough of a difference to earn Green Bay a win. But things were so close throughout, it doesn&#8217;t seem unfair to at least suggest it. Still, the Packers would have won at least one of those two games. With the way the NFC is shaping up, one extra win could make for a huge difference at the end.</p>
<p>Alright, enough with the &#8220;what-ifs.&#8221; Let&#8217;s now simply focus on the plays Matthews has made. The walk-off tackle of Michael Vick &#8211; in which he got past not one, but two, blockers &#8211; in week one. The drive-and-game-altering face masking call he drew on Minnesota&#8217;s Phil Loadholt on the Vikings&#8217; final drive. The game-changing sack of Mark Sanchez late in Sunday&#8217;s win. The first of those ended the game, obviously, but the last two were just as important. In many ways, they were plays that took the final bit of life out of those teams. Lesser players do not make such things happen.</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re keeping score, Matthews&#8217; absence has accounted for at least one loss. His presence was largely responsible for closing out three wins. Again, no disrespect to Rodgers, but you can not say he&#8217;s had the same impact. After all, his best game of the season came in a loss to Chicago.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s more than just the raw numbers. Matthews&#8217; presence brings an extra fire that can only come from great defenders. It&#8217;s the fire that Ray Lewis brings, the fire that Troy Polamalu brings. It&#8217;s the fire Reggie White used to bring.</p>
<p>If that player is in uniform, the entire team &#8211; not just the defense &#8211; seems to respond in a different way, because it knows that guy will bring effort from wire-to-wire. The results might not happen right away, or even for most of the game, but at some point, they&#8217;ll come.</p>
<p>Great quarterbacks provide a team with confidence, certainly something you need to win. But great defenders provide a team with passion. And when you&#8217;re as beat up as this current bunch of Packers are, that&#8217;s every bit as vital.</p>
<p>As long as No. 52 is crushing quarterbacks, delivering non-stop effort and, okay, flipping that hair, Green Bay will have a chance in every game it plays the rest of the way. Without him, the Packers would likely spend the rest of the season on a long journey towards the middle.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/11/02/the-most-indispensable-player-for-the-2010-green-bay-packers-is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packers move to Rodgers allowed Eagles to gamble with Kolb</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/09/07/packers-move-to-rodgers-allowed-eagles-to-gamble-with-kolb/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/09/07/packers-move-to-rodgers-allowed-eagles-to-gamble-with-kolb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL history lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuesday opposition glance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Celek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeSean Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Maclin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kolb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LeSean McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Shanahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Thompson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to be adding a new weekly feature at OBOD now that the season has begun. Every Tuesday (the players&#8217; off day) we&#8217;ll be running a column on the Green Bay Packers&#8217; upcoming opponent for that week. It may or may not touch on the Packers at all, but sometimes, of course, it will. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to be adding a new weekly feature at OBOD now that the season has begun. Every Tuesday (the players&#8217; off day) we&#8217;ll be running a column on the Green Bay Packers&#8217; upcoming opponent for that week. It may or may not touch on the Packers at all, but sometimes, of course, it will. This won&#8217;t necessarily replace my weekly humor post, but those won&#8217;t be running quite as often.</p>
<p>Why? It&#8217;s hard to come up with something funny every week. Who am I, Dane Cook?</p>
<p>(Wait &#8211; I&#8217;m way funnier than Dane Cook.)</p>
<p>ANYways, this week we will be discussing the Philadelphia Eagles. Enjoy.</p>
<p>With Aaron Rodgers gracing the cover of seemingly every NFL-related magazine on the planet, being touted as everyone&#8217;s preseason MVP and sitting at the controls for a popular Super Bowl pick, it&#8217;s easy to forget one simple fact:</p>
<p>He was almost universally disliked by Packers fans for the first two-plus years of his career.</p>
<p>His selection in the first round of the 2005 draft made no sense to us, the Packers a playoff team the year before and surely needing help elsewhere (plus, there was that Favre guy that we sort of worshipped). His on-field performance was initially bleak, as well, Rodgers showing little command of an NFL offense and exhibiting poor body language and a tendency for injury.<br />
<span id="more-2742"></span><br />
Then came the 2007 preseason. Indeed, this was the first time we all saw the potential Rodgers had. His performance against Dallas that year, subbing for an injured Favre, gave us even more hope. This &#8211; and other things &#8211; led Packers management to stick with Rodgers over Favre in the summer of 2008, even with the aging diva doing everything he could to get the team to chuck the youngster aside.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a move that could have &#8211; or even would have &#8211; been copied by many NFL teams. A lot needs to be in place to make such a decision.</p>
<p>The Philadelphia Eagles decided they had more than enough in place to copy what Green Bay did two years ago. As a result, they replaced aging quarterback Donovan McNabb with Kevin Kolb in an experiment that officially begins Sunday at Lincoln Financial Field against the Packers (couldn&#8217;t have scripted that last part better if you tried).</p>
<p>The situations mirror each other so perfectly, you have to think the Eagles studied the Favre/Rodgers switch with a bit more than a passing interest (no pun intended). Upon doing so, they likely asked themselves the following questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Has McNabb peaked as a player in the same way Favre had?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answer: Undoubtedly. McNabb was certainly a very good &#8211; if not truly elite &#8211; quarterback for a long period of time. McNabb led the Eagles to eight playoff appearances, including five trips to the NFC Championship Game and one Super Bowl berth, a loss to New England in 2005.</p>
<p>His play hadn&#8217;t necessarily slipped a great deal in recent years, but he appeared to have leveled off, throwing 23 touchdowns and 11 interceptions in 2008 and 22/10 in those same categories last year. His completion percentages over that span? 60.4 and 60.3. On top of that, his ability to hurt defenses with his scrambling &#8211; a huge part of his success &#8211; had gone way down as he totaled just 287 yards rushing over the past two seasons (147 and 140, respectively, again eerily similar).</p>
<p>That would have been more acceptible to the Eagles, I&#8217;m guessing, if McNabb was doing well in the postseason. But he really wasn&#8217;t, recording just one out-and-out good showing over Philly&#8217;s last four playoff games (a 375-yard, three-touchdown performance in the &#8216;09 NFC title game loss at Arizona). Like the Packers deciding Favre was never going to change, particularly in the postseason, the Eagles decided the soon-to-be 34-year old McNabb was never going to hit another level.</p>
<ul>
<li>Had Kolb shown enough in his limited playing time to warrant such a change, the way Rodgers had?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answer: Clearly. In fact, Kolb &#8211; who also sat for three seasons before being named starter &#8211; may have shown a little more. In two starts last year for the injured McNabb &#8211; another factor in this whole process: McNabb had trouble staying healthy &#8211; Kolb completed nearly 65 percent of his passes for over 700 yards, with four touchdowns and three picks. He went 1-1, beating lowly Kansas City but losing to New Orleans. Compare that to what the Packers had seen from Rodgers, which was basically two-and-a-half quarters of regular season football.</p>
<p>Some may laugh when told that a team is going to ditch a proven player for a youngster based off of two games, but in the NFL, two games can go a long way in such decision-making, particularly at quarterback. After all, if Kolb fared that well in his first two games, he&#8217;d only get better, right? Not saying I necessarily agree with such a thought process, but that is how it goes a lot of times.</p>
<ul>
<li>Is the team going in a younger direction, anyways, making Kolb a better fit the way Rodgers was?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answer: You bet. McNabb, like Favre before him, sat back and watched as the players he had come to know and be friends with were shipped out in favor of younger models, particularly on his side of the ball. Players like tight end Brent Celek, wideouts DeSean Jackson and Jeremy Maclin and running back LeSean McCoy are all 25 and younger. Think they relate better to the now 26-year old Kolb or McNabb?</p>
<p>Granted, McNabb made that work, at times, much like Favre did towards the end in Green Bay. But make no mistake: There was a gap between Favre and his youthful weapons, all of whom seemed to care for Rodgers much more (probably because he actually talked to them, but that&#8217;s just my theory). To read much of what came out of Philly after the McNabb trade &#8211; <a href="http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/blogs/david_weinberg/article_a919593e-5c90-11df-a83f-001cc4c002e0.html">here&#8217;s an example</a> &#8211; it sounded like a similar story was happening there. Chemistry matters more in the NFL than in any other sport, particularly how a team vibes with its quarterback. The vibe is much stronger with Kolb.</p>
<ul>
<li>Do the men calling the shots in Philly have decent enough job security, the way Ted Thompson, Mike McCarthy and Mark Murphy had?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answer: I&#8217;d sure say so. Andy Reid and the rest of the Eagles&#8217; front office are well-entrenched. In fact, only Tennessee&#8217;s Jeff Fisher (1994) has been running his team longer than Reid.</p>
<p>With that kind of security, Reid is bound to be given some leeway with Kolb. Even if his first couple of seasons aren&#8217;t that good, Reid isn&#8217;t going anywhere, especially when you consider Kolb is only the second quarterback he&#8217;s ever had. Reid would likely get at least one more shot with a new quarterback before the team decided to pull the plug. Think of all the guys Mike Shanahan went through, post-John Elway, before he finally got the boot.</p>
<p>When you&#8217;ve built up the credibility of an Andy Reid, you should be allowed to replace an aging player, even one as important as McNabb. Now, if this fails, a good deal of Reid&#8217;s credibility goes with it, but he has it now &#8211; like Thompson, McCarthy and Murphy did two years ago &#8211; and decided to use it. Can&#8217;t fault him there.</p>
<ul>
<li>Lastly, how will the switch go over with the fans?</li>
</ul>
<p>Answer: Much better than it did in Green Bay. Though many Philly fans did not like the selection of Kolb in the 2007 draft &#8211; I don&#8217;t know that many Eagles fans, but a friend of mine is from south Jersey and he does and the guys he knows hated it &#8211; many were never really in love with McNabb. Let me rephrase that, actually &#8211; a lot of them never even liked McNabb. Despite his many successes, he was always quick to be booed by the home faithful on even mediocre days. Although Philly fans are notoriously brutal to almost everyone, anyways.</p>
<p>That put the Eagles in a much easier position than the Packers were in in 2008, having to ship away the most beloved player in team history. Fans there have not reacted with anywhere near the same brutality as Packers fans did back then. Remember, some of you actually booed Rodgers during the &#8220;Family Night&#8221; scrimmage that year, a truly shameful display if there ever was one (I guess we <em>do</em> have something in common with Philly fans, after all).</p>
<p>When you add it all up, the timing was perfect for the Eagles to make such a switch. In fact, it was never going to be better, if you really think about it.</p>
<p>The Packers have looked like geniuses for how they handled the switch. The Eagles? Well, starting Sunday, they&#8217;re going to find out.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/09/07/packers-move-to-rodgers-allowed-eagles-to-gamble-with-kolb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The third OBOD mock draft (aka, &#8220;OBOD&#8217;s Thirteen&#8221;)</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/07/the-third-obod-mock-draft-aka-obods-thirteen/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/07/the-third-obod-mock-draft-aka-obods-thirteen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Mock Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC North News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers Draft News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Albert Haynesworth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anquan Boldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asante Samuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Cushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Bulaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Spiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Dunlap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sproles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deion Sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dez Bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Freeney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Berry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flozell Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamal Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Odrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Pierre-Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermaine Gresham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Clausen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Haden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joey Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Hamlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Vanden Bosch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Bulger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanchez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurkice Pouncey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Iupati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Singletary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ndamukong Suh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rex Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Mathis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolando McClain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russ Grimm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Okung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Weatherspoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Mays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Cody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Heap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two mock drafts down, two more to go until draft day (15 days from now!!).</p>
<p>Since our last mock, three weeks ago, there have been a handful of trades/signings that have caused this third mock to change. But more than anything, the array of pro days and increased overall chatter amongst &#8220;insiders&#8221; (which we at OBOD are definitely not) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two mock drafts down, two more to go until draft day (15 days from now!!).</p>
<p>Since <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/16/obod-mock-draft-the-sequel/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">our last mock</a>, three weeks ago, there have been a handful of trades/signings that have caused this third mock to change. But more than anything, the array of pro days and increased overall chatter amongst &#8220;insiders&#8221; (which we at OBOD are definitely not) has had the biggest effect on this new mock.</p>
<p>What does it look like now? Well, let&#8217;s find out, shall we?</p>
<p>(By the way, the &#8220;Ocean&#8217;s Thirteen&#8221; reference is strictly a joke. I can guarantee this mock will not be as bad as that film. God help me if I&#8217;m wrong.)</p>
<p>1. St. Louis Rams &#8211; Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma. Monday&#8217;s release of Marc Bulger, coupled with Bradford&#8217;s very good pro day showing last week, make the likelihood that he goes to the Rams exponentially greater. They clearly need a guy and, while my doubts about Bradford remain, he&#8217;s the best of the bunch and a pick St. Louis can sell to its fans.</p>
<p>2. Detroit Lions &#8211; Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska. Truth be told, I think the Lions would love to trade out of this spot. But I&#8217;m just not sure anyone will want this pick badly enough to make a move. In the event Detroit hangs on to the pick, Suh has to be the guy. He&#8217;s equally good against the run and the pass and would give the Lions a genuine difference-maker in the front seven, something head coach Jim Schwartz desperately needs.</p>
<p>3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers &#8211; Gerald McCoy, DT, Oklahoma. I&#8217;ve had the Bucs going with Eric Berry in my first two mocks. This time around, I think McCoy will be pick. The Bucs, much like Detroit, need an impact player along the line as they only recorded 28 sacks last season (tied for 26th in the league). McCoy isn&#8217;t quite as good against the run as Suh is, but his pass rush skills will allow him to make an immediate difference.</p>
<p>4. Washington Redskins &#8211; Russell Okung, OT, Oklahoma State. Sunday&#8217;s trade for Donovan McNabb eliminates any speculation that Washington will select Jimmy Clausen. That trade also leaves the &#8216;Skins with just one pick in the first three rounds and you have to think they&#8217;d love to trade down. Like the Lions, though, I doubt they find much interest. In that case, they&#8217;ll go with Okung, the best o-lineman in the draft and someone who can help cover McNabb right away.</p>
<p>5. Kansas City Chiefs &#8211; Eric Berry, S, Tennessee. People seem to be cooling on Berry a little bit, and I&#8217;m not sure why. Forget about all the postseason workout stuff and just put on the tape. This kid&#8217;s a star in the making. Works out well for the Chiefs, then, as they need secondary help &#8211; particularly at safety &#8211; in a major way. In five years, we very well could be looking at Berry as the best player to come out of this draft.<br />
<span id="more-1933"></span><br />
6. Seattle Seahawks &#8211; Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa. While questions initially existed as to how high Bulaga&#8217;s ceiling really is, he seems to be gaining momentum in recent weeks. His size (6-feet, 6-inches, 312 pounds) and the recent track record of former Big Ten Offensive Lineman of the Year winners (Jake Long, Joe Thomas) likely have a lot do to with this. Plus, <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/04/05/mcnabb/4.html">Peter King reported in his &#8220;Monday Morning Quarterback&#8221;</a> column this week that Seattle GM John Schneider &#8211; remember him? &#8211; loves Bulaga. Makes too much sense not to happen.</p>
<p>7. Cleveland Browns &#8211; Earl Thomas, S, Texas. Another change from my first two mock drafts comes in this spot, where I originally had the Brownies going with Florida corner Joe Haden. But last week&#8217;s trade for former Eagle Sheldon Brown crosses corner off Cleveland&#8217;s list of needs. The Browns will still look to upgrade their secondary, one of the worst in football in 2009, but will do so with Thomas. A bit undersized (5-feet, 10-inches, just under 200 pounds), Thomas makes up for it with dynamic playmaking skills and excellent speed.</p>
<p>8. Oakland Raiders &#8211; Jason Pierre-Paul, OLB, South Florida. Crazy Al loves measurables. Pierre-Paul has measurables (6-feet, 6-inches, 265 pounds, amazing speed). Crazy Al loves Pierre-Paul. Done and done.</p>
<p>9. Buffalo Bills &#8211; Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame. Where Clausen lands is quickly becoming one of the big stories surrounding this year&#8217;s draft. Some think he could go top five, while others have him a bit lower. Put me in the latter group as I still think Buffalo is his likely destination. As I&#8217;ve said before, the Bills need hope of some kind, <em>any</em> kind. As of now, they have nothing. While my doubts about Clausen are even bigger than those of Bradford, he&#8217;ll definitely provide some hope.</p>
<p>10. Jacksonville Jaguars &#8211; Dez Bryant, WR, Oklahoma State. I&#8217;ve said all along this is where Bryant goes and I&#8217;m sticking to it. The Jags need a big-time threat in the passing game. And Bryant, despite some character issues (mainly listening to Deion Sanders), is the closest thing to a big-time wideout in this draft. He&#8217;s not overly fast, but is big and tough with very good hands. Could be an immediate impact player for Jacksonville.</p>
<p>11. Denver Broncos (from Bears) - Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama. No movement here, either. McClain is by far the best ILB in this draft and a perfect fit for the 3-4 scheme that Denver runs (it&#8217;s the scheme he played in at Alabama). With a (presumably) healthy Jamal Williams eating up space in front of him, McClain should be able to punish ballcarriers for quite some time in Denver.</p>
<p>12. Miami Dolphins &#8211; Dan Williams, DT, Tennessee. Same position, different play for this pick as I originally had Miami going with UCLA&#8217;s Brian Price. I&#8217;ve got the Dolphins going with Williams this time, though, as he&#8217;s more of a prototypical 3-4 nose tackle. He&#8217;s got the size (325 pounds) and strength to be a force at the position, good because Jason Ferguson is old (35) and will miss the first eight games of the year (performance-enhancing drugs).</p>
<p>13. San Francisco 49ers &#8211; Joe Haden, CB, Florida. The 49ers will be doing cartwheels on draft night if Haden is indeed here, and I think he will be. His slight fall isn&#8217;t caused by anything he&#8217;s done (or hasn&#8217;t done), but rather because the teams above San Fran don&#8217;t really need a corner that badly. Haden is the best corner in this draft and should contribute right away.</p>
<p>14. Seattle Seahawks (from Broncos) &#8211; C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson. Spiller seems to be rising in the eyes of some &#8220;insiders&#8221;, but really, I doubt he goes before this spot. That doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s lacking potential to be very, very good, because he isn&#8217;t. I just don&#8217;t think anyone else will look running back before here. That&#8217;s a good thing indeed for the Seahawks as Spiller could be Bush 2.0 for Pete Carroll. With Bulaga and Spiller in the fold, Seattle&#8217;s offense should be much better next season.</p>
<p>15. New York Giants &#8211; Trent Williams, OT, Oklahoma. As I&#8217;ve stated previously, I have it on good authority &#8211; and by &#8220;good authority&#8221;, I mean my good friend/Giants superfan Matt Anderson &#8211; that Big Blue would love to snag McClain with this pick. I&#8217;m not sure he&#8217;ll be there, though, and if New York can&#8217;t get him, it will go with Williams. He&#8217;s got solid upside and would provide an instant upgrade at right tackle &#8211; his likely spot in the pros.</p>
<p>16. Tennessee Titans &#8211; Sergio Kindle, DE/OLB, Texas. The Titans struggled getting to the quarterback last season, their first without Fat Albert. That area looks to be even weaker now with Kyle Vanden Bosch&#8217;s departure to Detroit. In order to boost it back up, Tennessee will look to Kindle. At 255 pounds, you can forget about Kindle playing defensive end in the NFL. But as an outside linebacker, he brings much to the table, mainly his relentless nature and instinctive knack for getting to the QB.</p>
<p> 17. San Francisco 49ers (from Panthers) &#8211; Anthony Davis, OT, Rutgers. My previous mock had Davis to the Niners with the 13th pick. I still think this is where he ends up, though he&#8217;ll have to wait a little bit longer now. Davis&#8217; solid pro day showing put some of the doubts surrounding him to rest, but questions about his work ethic and weight still remain. He&#8217;s got potential to be very, very good &#8211; if he can get with a coach that stays on him at all times. Enter Mike Singletary.</p>
<p>18. Pittsburgh Steelers &#8211; Mike Iupati, OG, Idaho. I still can&#8217;t believe the Steelers won it all two seasons ago with such a weak offensive line. That group wasn&#8217;t a whole lot better last season, either, and Pittsburgh must improve up front if it hopes to get back into serious AFC contention. Iupati could definitely help that cause. A 6-feet, 5-inch, 330 pound beast, Iupati is a throwback type of lineman. No zone blocking schemes for this guy &#8211; he just wants to maul.</p>
<p>19. Atlanta Falcons &#8211; Derrick Morgan, DE/OLB, Georgia Tech. I had Morgan going to Atlanta in my original mock. After a quick detour for our second mock, he&#8217;s back in Atlanta this time. Morgan is perhaps the best all-around defensive end in this draft. He&#8217;s solid against the run and a terror as a pass-rusher (12 sacks, two forced fumbles last season). His addition will be a big boost to Atlanta&#8217;s defense and should put the Falcons solidly back in playoff contention next season.</p>
<p>20. Houston Texans &#8211; Brian Price, DT, UCLA. Same position, different player for Houston this time around, as I previously had the Texans going with Penn State&#8217;s Jared Odrick. With Price still on the board, though, he&#8217;s likely the guy. He&#8217;s a hair better against the run than is Odrick, with equal pass-rushing skills. Houston hit a home run by taking a Pac-10 defensive player last season (USC&#8217;s Brian Cushing), so why not do it again?</p>
<p>21. Cincinnati Bengals &#8211; Maurkice Pouncey, C, Florida. Toughness is lacking for the Bengals&#8217; offense. That changes significantly with the addition of Pouncey, a physical, nasty lineman. He&#8217;s also intelligent, athletic and incredibly versatile (having played both guard and center for a big-time program). The Bengals could also look for another playmaker on offense here, but Pouncey is too good to pass up. They can grab a wideout in round two.</p>
<p>22. New England Patriots &#8211; Brandon Graham, DE/OLB, Michigan. Again, little change at this spot. New England still needs to improve its pass rush and Graham will give the Pats the best chance to do that. He&#8217;s an incredibly smart player who never stops coming at you and just knows how to get the job done (averaging nine sacks a year over his last three seasons at Michigan). The Hoodie has never been scared off by tweeners and I doubt that changes now. He&#8217;ll love this guy.</p>
<p>23. Green Bay Packers &#8211; Charles Brown, OT, USC. As usual, I&#8217;ll go a little longer here as this is a Packers blog. First, as draft night nears, I&#8217;m becoming more and more certain that Ted Thompson will trade out of this spot. The Packers have a few holes to fill, and if Thompson can pick up a couple more selections in the first few rounds, he can pretty much fill them all. He can not do so if he hangs on to this pick. As for the idea of taking an outside linebacker here, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s certainly possible. But Brad Jones has a lot of potential and I think the Packers will wait on that spot. Hence, if they keep the pick, they&#8217;ll have to go with a tackle and Brown is the best left on the board. Again, yes, he&#8217;s got weight left to put on, but his pass protection skills are already very good. He could be the guy for a long, long time. This team can not wait any longer to find its left tackle of the future and history shows you have the best chance of getting Pro Bowl talent at that position in round one.</p>
<p>24. Philadelphia Eagles &#8211; Kyle Wilson, CB, Boise State. While trading Brown filled Cleveland&#8217;s void for a corner, it opened a void at that spot for the Eagles. Wilson has excellent ball skills, can play both man and zone and is an excellent return man. He&#8217;d look good opposite Asante Samuel. Philly is flush with picks after its two trades and can address its need for a pass rusher in the second round.</p>
<p>25. Baltimore Ravens &#8211; Jermaine Gresham, TE, Oklahoma. Baltimore&#8217;s trade for Anquan Boldin originally had me thinking it would look defense with this pick. Then I remembered just how inconsistent/ineffective Todd Heap really was last season and changed my mind. Gresham has some concerns due to his knee injury from last season, but when you look at him on tape, it&#8217;s clear he can be a big-time playmaker. You can never give a young quarterback too many of those, right?</p>
<p>26. Arizona Cardinals &#8211; Bruce Campbell, OT, Maryland. My first two mock drafts have had the Cards going defense, specifically outside linebacker. The recent addition of Joey Porter crosses that off the list, though, and I now believe Arizona will look to upgrade along the line. Campbell certainly has his share of question marks, but his upside is too much to pass on here. If anyone can get the most out of this guy, it&#8217;s Russ Grimm.</p>
<p>27. Dallas Cowboys &#8211; Taylor Mays, S, USC. Having recently cut Flozell Adams, it&#8217;s a good bet the Cowboys will be looking for his replacement at this spot. Unfortunately for them, the top six tackles are already gone. That being the case, Dallas will look to replace Ken Hamlin &#8211; also recently released &#8211; with Mays. Mays projects as a strong safety in the pros. In fact, he&#8217;s so big (230 pounds) and such a good tackler/hitter, some have suggested he could be moved to outside linebacker eventually. Either way, he&#8217;s got good value for Dallas here.</p>
<p>28. San Diego Chargers &#8211; Ryan Matthews, RB, Fresno State. My first two mocks have had the Bolts going with Alabama&#8217;s Terrence Cody. This time around, though, I think Matthews is the pick. San Diego needs a presence in the run game, something Darren Sproles just doesn&#8217;t provide. Matthews is a good combination of power and speed and his lack of pass-catching skills wouldn&#8217;t be a problem with Sproles in the fold.</p>
<p>29. New York Jets &#8211; Sean Weatherspoon, OLB, Missouri. The Jets are moving in the right direction, offensively, provided Mark Sanchez continues to develop. The defense is pretty damn good, too, but could use one more player, particularly another outside linebacker. Weatherspoon should quickly become a favorite of Rex Ryan&#8217;s. He&#8217;s a hard-hitting, hard-working linebacker who knows how to play the run and blitz the quarterback.</p>
<p>30. Minnesota Vikings &#8211; Terrence Cody, DT, Alabama. I still think Minnesota wants to snag a corner with this pick, but I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anyone left on the board worth taking this high. The Vikes will then turn their focus to the d-line. The possibility of dual four-game suspensions for Pat and Kevin Williams, plus Pat&#8217;s age (38 in October), make upgrading that spot a priority. Cody has some issues (weight, focus, etc.), but if he&#8217;s reigned in, he could become a dominant run-stuffer in the pros. Minnesota looks for a back to compliment Adrian Peterson in round two.</p>
<p>31. Indianapolis Colts &#8211; Jared Odrick, DT, Penn State. The Colts will likely hope one of the top six tackles fall to this spot (previously, I had them going with Campbell, for example) as Charlie Johnson just isn&#8217;t the long-term guy at that spot. Since they are all gone, however, Indy will look to solidify itself at d-tackle instead. The Colts need to get an impact player between Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis. Odrick has decent size (306 pounds), recorded seven sacks last season and should help take some heat off those two.</p>
<p>32. New Orleans Saints &#8211; Carlos Dunlap, DE/DT, Florida. The recent release of Charles Grant leaves a void along the d-line for the <a title="Jump to tool buttons - Alt+Q, Jump to editor - Alt-Z, Jump to element path - Alt-X" accesskey="z" href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=1933##utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" onfocus="tinyMCE.getInstanceById('content').focus();"><!-- IE --></a>defending champs (still feels weird writing that about the Saints). Dunlap lacks motivation at times &#8211; and has an unfortunate DUI arrest &#8211; but he&#8217;s also a monster talent. He recorded nine sacks in each of the past two seasons and, if New Orleans can keep a fire under him, it could end up with great value here.</p>
<p>One final note: This will be my last solo mock before the draft. Our final mock will be a three-man super mock, featuring Adam, Gene and myself. We&#8217;re going to run that the day before the draft, so stay tuned. It should be a lot of fun and will hopefully sound nothing like Asia (they were a super-group from the 80s&#8230;damn you kids).</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/07/the-third-obod-mock-draft-aka-obods-thirteen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick thoughts on the McNabb trade</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/04/quick-thoughts-on-the-mcnabb-trade/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/04/quick-thoughts-on-the-mcnabb-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 03:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kolb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Goodell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, I know this is a Green Bay Packers blog.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I figured I&#8217;d offer up some quick thoughts on tonight&#8217;s announcement that quarterback Donovan McNabb has been traded from Philadelphia to Washington for a second round pick this year and either a third or fourth round pick next year. After all, the trade does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, yes, I know this is a Green Bay Packers blog.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I figured I&#8217;d offer up some quick thoughts on tonight&#8217;s announcement that quarterback Donovan McNabb has been traded from Philadelphia to Washington for a second round pick this year and either a third or fourth round pick next year. After all, the trade does involve two NFC teams (who play in the same division, which makes this trade even more shocking) and, like we&#8217;ve always said, we at OBOD like to focus on league-wide news from time-to-time.</p>
<p>(Oh, by the way, happy Easter everyone!)</p>
<p>The first thought that comes to mind on this trade: The Eagles better be damn sure Kevin Kolb is a winner. Because while McNabb has only made it to one Super Bowl &#8211; which he lost &#8211; despite five trips to the NFC Championship Game, the fact remains that <em>he&#8217;s made it to five NFC Championship Game</em>s. He&#8217;s still a top 10 quarterback who, at age 33, likely has at least three very good seasons left in him. Kolb, on the other hand, is still very much an unknown. If he can play, the Eagles should be just fine. If Kolb bombs, head coach Andy Reid won&#8217;t be long for Philly - even if he has that new extension in his back pocket.</p>
<p>For Washington, this is ultimately a very good deal. While I like Jason Campbell (he&#8217;s never really been given a fair shake, mainly due to consistently subpar supporting casts), McNabb is a massive upgrade. If things work out for him there, he&#8217;ll probably sign an extension &#8211; this is the last year of his contract &#8211; and the Redskins will have a nice three or four year window to do some good things. If things don&#8217;t work out, Washington can simply franchise him and trade him next spring, in effect re-gaining whatever it gave up to get him. In other words, a no-lose proposition.</p>
<p>For the NFC East, as a whole, this trade makes New York and Dallas the teams to beat as of now. Philly will likely take, at the very least, a small step back. Washington will be better, no question, but McNabb alone can only do so much (subpar offensive line, lack of real playmakers at the skill positions, etc.).</p>
<p>Finally, for the NFL, this trade is a grand slam as it gives the league two more games that are guaranteed to draw massive ratings next season. Somewhere, Roger Goodell is smiling.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/04/04/quick-thoughts-on-the-mcnabb-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regular season game fifteen vs. Seattle: Time to look ahead</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/28/regular-season-game-fifteen-vs-seattle-time-to-look-ahead/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/28/regular-season-game-fifteen-vs-seattle-time-to-look-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adrian Peterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ahman Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anquan Boldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Childress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brent Celek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Westbrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeSean Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.J. Henderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarrett Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Whitten]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Maclin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larry Fitzgerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miles Austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Percy Harvin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Romo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wade Phillips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Green Bay Packers are in the playoffs.</p>
<p>You know what? I&#8217;m going to say that one again, this time with feeling:</p>
<p>THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE IN THE (EXPLETIVE DELETED) PLAYOFFS!</p>
<p>YES!!</p>
<p>Sunday&#8217;s 48-10 home demolition of the woeful Seattle Seahawks &#8211; what&#8217;s happened to THEM? &#8211; combined with a New York Giants loss puts the now 10-5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Green Bay Packers are in the playoffs.</p>
<p>You know what? I&#8217;m going to say that one again, this time with feeling:</p>
<p>THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE IN THE (EXPLETIVE DELETED) PLAYOFFS!</p>
<p>YES!!</p>
<p>Sunday&#8217;s 48-10 home demolition of the woeful Seattle Seahawks &#8211; what&#8217;s happened to THEM? &#8211; combined with a New York Giants loss puts the now 10-5 Packers back in the posteason after a one year absence.</p>
<p>The game itself was a mini-vacation to bizzaro world &#8211; A.J. Hawk and Jarrett Bush had interceptions and Brandon Jackson and Ahman Green combined for four touchdowns, after all &#8211; so we won&#8217;t really be focusing on that.</p>
<p>Instead, let&#8217;s take a look ahead at the possible playoff opponents for the Packers. Things won&#8217;t fully shake out until late Sunday afternoon next week &#8211; the numerous scenarios are truly mind-boggling as Gene and I figured out on the phone Sunday night - but for now there are four possible opponents for Green Bay. And here they are, ranked by least-to-most fearful:</p>
<ol>
<li>Arizona Cardinals, 10-5, winners of the NFC West &#8211; The Cardinals, who will play the Pack next week, present some difficult matchups, no question about it. Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin form the best receiver tandem in the game, Kurt Warner can pick defenses apart with his quick release and the defense is much better than it gets credit for. Plus, this group knows how to win in January. It&#8217;s still weird to say that about the Cards, but it&#8217;s true. On the other hand, the Cards don&#8217;t present much of a threat in the ground game, offensively (27th in rushing) or defensively (19th in run defense). The Packers&#8217; ever-improving run game could take advantage there, allowing Green Bay to eat time up and keep the offense off the field. When Arizona&#8217;s offense is on the field, Warner is pretty immobile and prone to turning the ball over at times. The Packers could be able to tee off on Warner, as he plays behind a somewhat shaky offensive line.</li>
<li>Dallas Cowboys, 10-5, second place in NFC East &#8211; The Cowboys clinched a spot with their win over the Washington Redskins on Sunday night. A win over Philadelphia next week will give Dallas the division. The Cowboys seem to have pulled themselves out of their usual December nosedive, Tony Romo is playing better ball as of late and the front seven can still wreak havoc for opposing offenses. Plus, as Gene likes to say, the mob refs will be in the house for the first playoff game at Jerry Jones&#8217; new palace. Don&#8217;t discount the trouble that could cause. On the other hand, Green Bay already proved it could beat Dallas (a 17-7 win in early November saved the Pack&#8217;s season). Outside of Jason Whitten and Miles Austin, Dallas doesn&#8217;t have much in the way of gamebreaking talent on offense. Quick throws and timely running can stifle the Cowboys&#8217; pass rush. Finally, with all the pressure that will surely be on Romo and head coach Wade Phillips, don&#8217;t you think a quick 10-0 or 14-3 deficit would cause Dallas to fall apart fast? I sure do.</li>
<li>Minnesota Vikings, 11-3, winners of the NFC North &#8211; Believe it or not, the Packers could be in for round three versus Judas in the first round of the playoffs. Just thinking about that almost makes my head explode. Can you imagine? Anyways, obviously we know about the troubles Minnesota presents. In two wins over Green Bay this year, the Vikings got stellar efforts from Judas, the receivers and the offensive line. The defense was pretty good, too, particularly in rushing Aaron Rodgers. On the other hand, this would not be the same Vikings team Green Bay saw earlier. Judas is doing his usual December flopping act (plus, there&#8217;s trouble in paradise between him and head coach Brad Childress). Adrian Peterson is still being shutdown far too often. Percy Harvin&#8217;s medical issues take away a key Judas target. Most importantly, the defense is not the same monster it was. The front four is tiring considerably as the season goes on and E.J. Henderson&#8217;s gruesome knee injury took away the leader of the defense. Most importantly, the Packers proved to themselves in the second half of the second game that they could indeed play with Minnesota. They didn&#8217;t know that before, in my mind. A third meeting would give them a chance to see that through.</li>
<li>Philadelphia Eagles, 11-4, first place in the NFC East &#8211; Without question, the worst possible matchup for the Packers in the first round. Donovan McNabb can still avoid pressure with the best of them and is usually great in January. The defense thrives on pressure and turnovers (much like Green Bay). What scares me the most, though, is the overall offensive speed Philly has. I&#8217;m not knocking Green Bay&#8217;s defense or anything, but let&#8217;s be honest: It&#8217;s not the fastest group you&#8217;ve ever seen. You saw Minnesota take advantage of that twice already this season. I mean, I see the name DeSean Jackson and I see six catches, 131 yards and two scores against the Packers&#8217; defense. Jeremy Maclin is also a burner and Brent Celek has emerged as a top-five tight end this season. On the other hand, the Eagles haven&#8217;t really beaten anybody special as their four biggest wins have come over New York (twice), a Matt Ryan-less Atlanta and Denver. There might not be a playoff team in that bunch if Denver misses out. Philly is also not much of a threat to run the ball, healthy Brian Westbrook or not, and head coach Andy Reid can get tight in big games. A game with the Eagles would almost surely be a high-scoring affair, which could play into Green Bay&#8217;s hands because of its ability to run the ball.</li>
</ol>
<p>Anyway you slice it, the Packers will be in for a fight. It&#8217;s the playoffs, after all.</p>
<p>But ever since the loss to Tampa Bay &#8211; seven weeks ago, essentially a lifetime in the NFL &#8211; the Packers have shown an ability to fight, an ability to battle back from adversity. They&#8217;re mentally prepared for what they will face.</p>
<p>So, in the end, maybe we shouldn&#8217;t worry so much about our young, sometimes bipolar, Packers. Maybe we shouldn&#8217;t worry at all.</p>
<p>Our squad is in the playoffs. The season is already a smashing success.</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m smiling.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/28/regular-season-game-fifteen-vs-seattle-time-to-look-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The updated playoff picture&#8211;and plenty of problems</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/21/the-updated-playoff-picture-and-plenty-of-problems/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/21/the-updated-playoff-picture-and-plenty-of-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gene Bosling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Roethlisberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dom Capers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarrett Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kurt Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Romo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before last night, anything I wrote today was going to be in a state of despair. I went for a walk after Mike Wallace caught that touchdown, just to be alone with my thoughts. I got home and called any Packer fan I could think of who would be as negative about this loss as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before last night, anything I wrote today was going to be in a state of despair. I went for a walk after Mike Wallace caught that touchdown, just to be alone with my thoughts. I got home and called any Packer fan I could think of who would be as negative about this loss as me. But then I watched the Vikings. And then I read <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4761127" target="_blank">this</a>. Now, things don&#8217;t seem quite as bad.</p>
<p>Brett Favre&#8217;s oh-so-predictable December struggles (his record this month is 1-2, his passer rating in all three games has been in the 70s, and now he&#8217;s arguing with his coach) are a lot of fun. They don&#8217;t, however, change this basic concern: After watching the Packers&#8217; defense get carved up by the Pittsburgh Steelers yesterday, I don&#8217;t see a potential first-round playoff matchup that wouldn&#8217;t present plenty of issues for Green Bay.</p>
<p>From a positioning standpoint, yesterday&#8217;s 37-36 loss did nothing to change their spot. They&#8217;d still be the No. 5 seed, heading to Arizona in the first round. But from a readiness standpoint, it might have changed everything.</p>
<p>This was a chance for the Packers to take on the defending world champs at their place, end the Steelers&#8217; shot at a playoff berth and assert that this five-game winning streak (which has been largely built against inferior offenses) was not a fluke, but the coronation of a championship defense. Instead, they went soft when it counted.</p>
<p>Look at how the Steelers played the Packers yesterday. They made no attempt to run the ball, and from the first play of the game, they targeted the inferior replacements for Al Harris&#8211;CB Josh Bell and CB/S/BOME Jarrett Bush (that&#8217;s &#8220;Bane of My Existence&#8221;, for you OBOD newbies).  Ben Roethlisberger threw for 503 yards, and on a final drive where his offensive line kept adding more problems to an already-monumental task, Roethlisberger marched the Steelers down the field with a sense of inevitability. The Packers stopped sending extra rushers, content to shoot the same three guys after him again and again, and trusted the game to Bell, Bush and the rest of their coverage personnel executing assignments correctly. They lost&#8211;on a play where defensive coordinator Dom Capers gave Roethlisberger time, and then acted surprised when Bell, in his first game, didn&#8217;t play far enough underneath Mike Wallace. Uh, Dom&#8211;two-time Super Bowl-winning quarterback against rookie defender. Don&#8217;t tell me you didn&#8217;t see that one turning out exactly how it did.</p>
<p>And here&#8217;s how that relates to the Packers&#8217; playoff opponents: Every single one of them has the ability to do the same thing.</p>
<p><span id="more-1328"></span></p>
<p>Think there&#8217;s a mismatch in light of the fact Arizona has no running game? Think again. All they have to do is roll their excellent wide receivers out, force the Packers to probe the depths of their battered secondary, and make sure Kurt Warner gets rid of the ball before the Packers get to him. Now, Roethlisberger must be separated from Warner in an important facet of the game&#8211;he&#8217;s made a living out of holding the ball too long, dancing away from sacks and exploiting broken plays. Not exactly the best way to make a living, but hey, when you&#8217;re 250 pounds and Cullen Jenkins has no chance of ending the game by hitting you high and trying to bring you down, it can work.</p>
<p>Warner won&#8217;t do that, but he&#8217;s got one of the quickest releases in the game and possibly the most dangerous set of receivers in the league. And especially if the Packers struggle getting to him with their defensive line and have to open the middle of the field by blitzing, Warner can light them up.</p>
<p>You&#8217;d prefer the Eagles, you say? Donovan McNabb has almost as many weapons and a Roethlisberger-like penchant for making a living on broken plays. Tony Romo&#8217;s shown an ability to do that, too&#8211;although he doesn&#8217;t have the same number of options, he&#8217;ll give you a chance at some interceptions and the Packers proved they can beat Dallas. If they have to go to Cowboys Stadium, though, well&#8230;we know what happens with Jerry Jones and his mob refs.</p>
<p>And even as bad as both the Vikings and Saints looked this week, forget beating them. The Vikings could be vulnerable if Percy Harvin&#8217;s neck injury is serious and Judas is doing his late-season thing, but they&#8217;ve got enough in the tank to expose the Packers&#8217; secondary. And we saw what Drew Brees can do to the Packers last season. He&#8217;s been as good, if not better, this year.</p>
<p>So we can talk about wrapping up a wild-card and getting a playoff berth secured. We can root for the Redskins tonight and pore over all the scenarios. But yesterday proved something to me: The Packers are a one-and-done team, despite what this winning streak might have you thinking, and that&#8217;s a pretty unsatisfying place to be for a team that, on certain occasions, looks like it&#8217;s capable of so much more.</p>
<p><em>&#8211;Gene Bosling</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/12/21/the-updated-playoff-picture-and-plenty-of-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raji officially a Packer; Vick officially not</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/13/raji-officially-a-packer-vick-officially-not/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/13/raji-officially-a-packer-vick-officially-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cullen Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donovan McNabb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugene Monroe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnny Jolly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Kolb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Crabtree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Vick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Pickett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two big Packers-related stories broke within the past hour and change.</p>
<p>First, the team has signed No. 9 overall pick B.J. Raji (RAJI!! Second Raji reinstated), according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The same story suggests the contract is for five years.</p>
<p>The other comes in the form of the Philadelphia Eagles inking Michael Vick to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two big Packers-related stories broke within the past hour and change.</p>
<p>First, the team has signed No. 9 overall pick B.J. Raji (RAJI!! Second Raji reinstated), <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/53179157.html">according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</a>. The same story suggests the contract is for five years.</p>
<p>The other comes in the form of the Philadelphia Eagles inking Michael Vick to a two-year contract, according to ESPN&#8217;s Chris Mortensen. The news was announced during ESPN&#8217;s broadcast of the Pittsburgh-Arizona preseason game.</p>
<p>No monetary terms were available on either of the contracts.</p>
<p>(<strong>Update:</strong> the <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/53185617.html">Journal Sentinel is now reporting</a> the deal is a five-year contract worth $28.5 million with just under $18 mil in guaranteed dough. That&#8217;s a lot of burgers and cookies for the big fella.)</p>
<p>Obviously the Raji story is the most important as his nearly two-week long holdout is now a thing of the past. The signing comes roughly two days after Raji had left Green Bay as it seemed contract negotiations had reached a stalemate. Interesting that he signed despite the fact that both the No. 8 (Jacksonville tackle Eugene Monroe) and No. 10 picks (San Fran&#8217;s Michael Crabtree) remain unsigned.</p>
<p>Either way, this is very good news indeed. <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/2009/08/12/ladies-and-gentlemen-busari-has-left-the-building/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">Just a couple of days ago, I wrote</a> that Raji could be risking a big part of his rookie season if he allowed for his holdout to go on much longer. Now, though, that shouldn&#8217;t be a problem. He likely won&#8217;t play in Saturday&#8217;s preseason opener against Cleveland, but I would guess he&#8217;ll have enough practice time under his belt to play some in game two against Buffalo. He&#8217;ll likely play even more in game three against Arizona. That he will be ready for game three is very good because, as we all know, game three is the big dress rehearsal game of the preseason.</p>
<p>As of now, he&#8217;s quite a bit behind the rest of the d-line in terms of conditioning and learning the new scheme. But he&#8217;s a good enough player where he can likely catch up fairly quick, certainly in time for the season opener, anyways. The Packers can now count on a rotation of Raji, Ryan Pickett, Johnny Jolly and Cullen Jenkins for the three d-line spots. Not bad at all and if Justin Harrell can give the team anything &#8211; anything &#8211; Green Bay should have a very good rotation.</p>
<p>Now to the Vick story. I was hoping the Packers would make a move for Vick, but that was probably wishful thinking. He could have really added an extra dimension to the offense as an X-factor/slash-type player and, just maybe, become a solid quarterback under the grooming of Mike McCarthy. Not that he would have overtaken Aaron Rodgers or anything, but maybe he could have become a player that Green Bay could then trade for help elsewhere. Oh well.</p>
<p>That said, this is a good move for the Eagles. Donovan McNabb has had trouble staying healthy (and he was benched for a brief period last season, as well) and it doesn&#8217;t sound like the Eagles are totally sold on Kevin Kolb as their QB of the future. The team will get some time to see if it can salvage Vick as an actual passer and, until then, Philly can use him in multiple roles, providing a potentially big-time playmaker to its offense.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/08/13/raji-officially-a-packer-vick-officially-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

