<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Ol&#039; Bag of Donuts &#187; Peyton Manning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/tag/peyton-manning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com</link>
	<description>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 04:38:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.13" mode="simple" entry="simple" -->
	<itunes:summary>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Adam Somers</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Adam Somers</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>olbagofdonuts@gmail.com (Adam Somers)</managingEditor>
	<itunes:subtitle>Green Bay Packers news, rumors and prognostications</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:keywords>Green Bay Packers</itunes:keywords>
	
	<itunes:category text="Sports &amp; Recreation">
		<itunes:category text="Professional" />
	</itunes:category>
		<item>
		<title>Regular season game six vs. Miami: Rodgers&#8217; regression troubling</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/17/regular-season-game-six-vs-miami-rodgers-regression-troubling/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/17/regular-season-game-six-vs-miami-rodgers-regression-troubling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 04:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=3029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 season was supposed to be the year of Aaron Rodgers, the year he joined the truly elite group of signal-callers in the NFL.</p>
<p>His face was on the cover of every football-related magazine over the summer. Fans, analysts and media members alike gushed over what he would do. His time had come.</p>
<p>Six games into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 season was supposed to be the year of Aaron Rodgers, the year he joined the truly elite group of signal-callers in the NFL.</p>
<p>His face was on the cover of every football-related magazine over the summer. Fans, analysts and media members alike gushed over what he would do. His time had come.</p>
<p>Six games into the season, 2010 is looking like it will go down as the year Aaron Rodgers regressed.</p>
<p>We saw more of that again and again Sunday in the Green Bay Packers&#8217; 23-20 overtime loss to the Miami Dolphins at Lambeau Field. The loss, Green Bay&#8217;s third in four games, drops the Packers to 3-3 on the season.<br />
<span id="more-3029"></span><br />
Some fans will point to anything else they can, other than Rodgers. They will blame the refs, Mike McCarthy, the special teams or the injuries. They&#8217;ll tell you that Rodgers has little or no chance playing behind such a poor offensive line, that he&#8217;s been killed by the drops from the receivers. Can some truth be found in these options? Yes, there can. Certainly, it&#8217;s not all his fault this team keeps losing, despite consistently gutty efforts from an injury-ravaged defense, a unit that has allowed just 18.7 points per game this season.</p>
<p>But do not fool yourself, either. Rodgers simply has not been very good. The offense is a struggling, sputtering vehicle. Well, who is the driver of said vehicle? Oh, that&#8217;s right &#8211; QB12.</p>
<p>Numerous aspects of Rodgers&#8217; game have fallen off during the season. The biggest, of course, being his complete inability to get rid of the ball in a timely fashion. We saw plenty of that Sunday. Some of Miami&#8217;s five sacks and 10 quarterback hits fall on an overmatched offensive line. But, far more often, Rodgers was given plenty of time to make a play. For whatever reason, he failed to do so. </p>
<p>(Quick &#8211; count how many times you yelled, &#8220;Get rid of the damn ball, Aaron!&#8221; at your television. I bet it&#8217;s more than the amount of fingers you have.) </p>
<p>This resulted in countless plays where he either took a sack or eventually had to run out of the pocket before simply tossing the ball out of bounds (the latter a huge reason he finished just 18-of-33 passing). Those dead plays were especially crucial in the second quarter. Clinging to a 10-7 lead, the Packers whiffed on two drives in Dolphins territory. Rodgers took two sacks and almost threw a pick in those series, in case you weren&#8217;t sure.</p>
<p>Miami had been rattled by the way Green Bay stormed back into the game early in quarter two. Had the Packers capitalized there, they could have put a stranglehold on the game. An elite quarterback would have gotten the job done. Rodgers didn&#8217;t. Making matters worse, you could sense he <em>wasn&#8217;t</em> going to do it.</p>
<p>Some may point to his receivers and say the sacks/pressures Sunday were due to them not getting open. That might be true (I&#8217;m not Cris Collinsworth &#8211; I can&#8217;t access the coaches tape). It seems impossible that the receivers could be completely blanketed on each of those plays week after week, though, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>The real problem here is that, far too often, Rodgers seems unwilling to attempt the tight throws, the &#8220;dangerous&#8221; throws. Making such throws isn&#8217;t always a good idea, but consistently turning them down isn&#8217;t, either. Think I&#8217;m wrong? Put on some tape of Tom Brady or Peyton Manning or Drew Brees. They often have small passing windows. They still make the throws, though, because to be elite, you have to.</p>
<p>Rodgers won&#8217;t do it, even with all the non-Jermichael Finley talent at his disposal. If he doesn&#8217;t have a clear passing lane, that ball is not coming out. My best guess is that he&#8217;s intent on being the anti-Favre. No dangerous throws from me. Honestly, that approach was fine when he wasn&#8217;t throwing picks. But he&#8217;s already thrown seven this season (he had seven all of last year). He won&#8217;t make the dangerous throws, but he&#8217;ll still throw interceptions? Not good, and even worse when you toss in all the sacks he&#8217;s taken.</p>
<p>And if he&#8217;s the player many make him out to be, wouldn&#8217;t he be able to get it done when it mattered most? Yes, he was great on the final drive of regulation, leading Green Bay to a game-tying score. You can not take that away from him. But in the clutch &#8211; the real clutch &#8211; Rodgers has flat-out failed in consecutive weeks. Last week, against Washington, he turned in a three-and-out (in which he was sacked on third down) and a game-changing interception. Sunday? Another three-and-out, which included taking another horrendous sack on third-and-6. How many chances does he expect the defense to give him?</p>
<p>Throw in his truly poor body language throughout Sunday&#8217;s contest &#8211; don&#8217;t tell me his displeasure with the refs didn&#8217;t bring down his game at times, because it did &#8211; and you come away with a picture of a quarterback who seems to have very much lost his way. That&#8217;s troubling. I&#8217;m not ready to say he&#8217;s hit his ceiling yet, but I am wondering how high his ceiling is, exactly.  </p>
<p>For some reason, certain Packers fans just can not bring themselves to criticize whoever&#8217;s manning the quarterback position. Sorry, but this writer spent a decade and a half glossing over every flaw the last quarterback had, simply because he was a fan. He will not make that mistake again.</p>
<p>And it just so happens that that last guy is making his way back to town next Sunday night. Rodgers can erase many of my doubts with a strong performance in that one.</p>
<p>The season hangs in the balance. If it&#8217;s not panic time, it&#8217;s getting awfully close.</p>
<p>Your stage is set, Mr. Rodgers &#8211; what do you plan on doing with it?</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/17/regular-season-game-six-vs-miami-rodgers-regression-troubling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2010 Packers, five games in: Let reality be reality</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/13/the-2010-packers-five-games-in-let-reality-be-reality/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/13/the-2010-packers-five-games-in-let-reality-be-reality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady Poppinga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Clifton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryn Colledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dom Capers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Martz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Pickett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brady]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tramon Williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(Note: My streak of game recaps is officially over at 29. Don&#8217;t worry &#8211; I&#8217;ll start a new one Sunday.)</p>
<p>As Gene, Adam and myself exited FedEx Field on Sunday, following the Green Bay Packers&#8217; gutwrenching 16-13 overtime loss to the Washington Redskins, we found ourselves using variations of the same phrase over and over:</p>
<p>This team just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Note: My streak of game recaps is officially over at 29. Don&#8217;t worry &#8211; I&#8217;ll start a new one Sunday.)</p>
<p>As Gene, Adam and myself exited FedEx Field on Sunday, following the Green Bay Packers&#8217; gutwrenching 16-13 overtime loss to the Washington Redskins, we found ourselves using variations of the same phrase over and over:</p>
<p>This team just isn&#8217;t very good.</p>
<p>In the hours &#8211; about a day and a half&#8217;s worth in all &#8211; that followed our disheartened exit, our overall outlook didn&#8217;t change.</p>
<p>Then, upon arriving back in Minneapolis on Tuesday, I decided to grab some chinese food. My fortune cookie contained an interesting bit of wisdom: Let reality be reality, it said.</p>
<p>That got me to thinking about where the 2010 Packers are five games in.<br />
<span id="more-2994"></span><br />
What is the real reality with this team? Are the Packers the Super Bowl contenders we made them out to be for nine or so months? Are they the stumbling, bumbling trainwreck the three of us made them out to be in our postgame thoughts, which were fueled by anger (and, okay, a little bit of alcohol)?</p>
<p>Reality is rarely black and white. And, in this instance, so are the Packers.</p>
<p>They are not Super Bowl contenders, as we currently find them. Not even close. Let&#8217;s just get that out of the way right now.</p>
<p>There is no continuity to this team. With roughly a third of the season already in the books, it has yet to turn in a full 60 minutes of strong play. That&#8217;d be one thing if the Packers had come close, but by my count, they haven&#8217;t given us more than about 30 consecutive minutes. And that came against the Buffalo Bills, so you know, insert your own joke there.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the team, as a whole, but really, that extends to each of the three phases, as well. Outside of a few instances &#8211; the middle portion of the Philadelphia game, for example &#8211; the Packers have not been able to get all three units firing at once. The offense looks good in limited minutes early on against Detroit; the defense, Dom Capers in particular, tries its best to blow the game (with an assist from a suddenly out-of-synch offense).</p>
<p>Sunday, on the road in an environment that grew more hostile by the second, the defense came to play. Yes, things weren&#8217;t nearly as good minus Clay Matthews (how could they be?), but forget about the yardage totals. After all, Packers fans should know more than anyone else that they mean nothing, right? On the board, where it counts the most, Green Bay allowed 13 points in regulation. That should always &#8211; repeat: ALWAYS &#8211; be more than enough to win. But it wasn&#8217;t, was it? Nope, because the head coach refused to stick with what worked, seemingly more concerned with proving his intelligence than winning. Mike Martz, meet Mike McCarthy.</p>
<p>The killer instinct simply does not exist. We can take as many shots at Trent Dilfer for what he had to say about the team on ESPN earlier this week, but do not argue his point. He was correct. This team looks great, particularly offensively, in quarter one. After that, it&#8217;s gone. Against average competition, opponents that continually open themselves for the kill shot, the Packers continually fail to deliver it. Again, a third of the season is in the books. Shouldn&#8217;t that have developed by now?</p>
<p>The offensive line is officially back to where it was over the first eight games of 2009. Aaron Rodgers and the receivers have felt compelled to join them. In other words: terrible blocking, terrible pass catching and a quarterback who is making us look foolish for spending so much time saying he&#8217;s in the same group with such legitimate heavyweights as Peyton Manning, Tom Brady and Drew Brees. Aaron, meet Tony. You two are in the same grade!</p>
<p>Have I really left out the special teams all this time? I guess, but that&#8217;s only because I&#8217;d like to be able to eat dinner before midnight.</p>
<p>(Now, after saying ALL OF THIS, are ya ready for the part where I take you the other way?)</p>
<p>The 2010 Packers can still turn this thing around. They can become more than what they&#8217;ve been.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like the talent isn&#8217;t there, even with the injuries mounting faster than my blood alcohol level at the Hawk &#8216;n Dove last Saturday night (damn those girls from Philly!). The offense, even without Jermichael Finley, has talent. Considerable talent. Remember, Finley wasn&#8217;t Finley for 16 games last year. The unit was still pretty good, though, right?</p>
<p>That group just has to play better. Rodgers has to stop looking downfield with every single first read. He needs to hang in the pocket longer, even if pressure is coming. By immediately bouncing out of the pocket, he cuts down half the field. He needs to remember that Greg Jennings is on his team (and No. 85 needs to show himself to be worthy of the elite checks he cashes). Donald Driver needs to stop dropping four passes. That group feeds off his energy, positive or otherwise &#8211; I&#8217;m convinced of it. James Jones and Jordy Nelson have to cash in on the potential each has. It&#8217;s time. These are all things that can still happen.</p>
<p>The offensive line has got to find a way to improve. If they can&#8217;t, it&#8217;s time to swap some guys out (Chad Clifton and Daryn Colledge, I&#8217;m looking right at you). Didn&#8217;t we spend the entire offseason/training camp/preseason talking about the depth there? If the starters can&#8217;t hang, let&#8217;s see some of it, dammit.</p>
<p>I have no real beef with the defense, outside of some penalty issues. The defensive line has been great, both against the run and in providing pressure. That held true even after Ryan Pickett exited the game Sunday. Charles Woodson is struggling a bit, but he&#8217;s clearly good enough to turn that around. Tramon Williams has been this team&#8217;s best player, period. And we can talk all we want about no pass rushing linebacker opposite Matthews, but in a crucial moment in overtime Sunday, there was Brady Poppinga breaking through for a huge sack. It&#8217;s not entirely out of the realm of possibility that someone still emerges.</p>
<p>Things just need to be a little tighter overall with that group. And when Matthews returns, the defense can still take off to a very high level.</p>
<p>You need two more reasons? I&#8217;ve got you covered: the NFC, as a whole, and one Michael McCarthy.</p>
<p>The Packers have not been very good. But let&#8217;s face it &#8211; no one has in the NFC. As of now, there is only one team (the Atlanta Falcons) somewhat close to an elite level. And they&#8217;re not really that close. New Orleans is in a slump. Chicago can&#8217;t keep it up for 16 games, same for Tampa Bay. New York is looking tough, but the jury&#8217;s still out. Same for Philadelphia. And either Dallas or Minnesota will have its season, for all intents and purposes, end Sunday. Go Cowboys.</p>
<p>In other words, it&#8217;s chaos. And who thrives better in chaos than McCarthy?</p>
<p>Seriously, think of all the times we&#8217;ve written this guy off. Early in 2006. Late in 2006. Late in 2008. Midway through 2009. For a big guy, this cat sure dodges a lot of ammo. When things are at their darkest, he somehow finds a way to get the team to rally. Can he do it again? At this point, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d want to bet against him.</p>
<p>And, really, I&#8217;m only sure of one thing: I&#8217;m done talking about the first five weeks. This team is 0-0. The injuries are an issue. The schedule is much harder. We&#8217;re going to find out what this team is made of. Call me crazy, but that excites me.</p>
<p>Bring on the Dolphins.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/10/13/the-2010-packers-five-games-in-let-reality-be-reality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;d like to see from Packers/Colts</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/08/26/what-id-like-to-see-from-packerscolts/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/08/26/what-id-like-to-see-from-packerscolts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Training Camp Coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.J. Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Quarless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.J. Raji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Underwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breno Giacomini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Bulaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Woodson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cullen Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daryn Colledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Zombo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Jennings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarius Wynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jermichael Finley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jordy Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justin Harrell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kregg Lumpkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Flynn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Burnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Barnett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quinn Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Shields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spencer Havner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=2667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, the third preseason game is here. And, as Denny Green once famously informed us, this is the one that teams do not, in fact, play like it&#8217;s bull(expletive), bull(expletive)!</p>
<p>That could be especially true in this one, as the Green Bay Packers take on the Indianapolis Colts and some cat named Peyton at Lambeau Field tonight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the third preseason game is here. And, as Denny Green once famously informed us, this is the one that teams do not, in fact, play like it&#8217;s bull(expletive), bull(expletive)!</p>
<p>That could be especially true in this one, as the Green Bay Packers take on the Indianapolis Colts and some cat named Peyton at Lambeau Field tonight at 7 p.m. Lambeau Time on ESPN.</p>
<p>As usual in game No. 3, we should see the starters for each team play at least one half. That&#8217;ll be good, but here&#8217;s what I&#8217;d like to see from the entire team &#8211; starters, backups <em>and</em> guys who will be bagging groceries in a week:</p>
<p><strong>Offense</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A clear-cut winner emerge in the Daryn Colledge/Bryan Bulaga battle at left guard. Of course, that doesn&#8217;t mean I want to see one player struggle more than the other (even I don&#8217;t dislike Colledge that much). Rather, I&#8217;d like to see one guy turn in a dominating performance and win the job outright. It&#8217;s time to get the starting five set.</li>
<li>A lot of the running game in the first half, Brandon Jackson in particular. We all know what Ryan Grant can do and, while I think he should get a decent amount of carries, Jackson should be the main guy when the starters are in. He&#8217;s been good in the first two games, but it&#8217;s time for him to be tested against another team&#8217;s starters.</li>
<li>Greg Jennings on the sidelines in sweats, please. Don&#8217;t need his back spasms getting any worse.</li>
<li>Donald Driver, Jordy Nelson and James Jones make some plays in the first half. Those guys have been quiet in the first couple of games &#8211; Driver was out last Saturday, though &#8211; and it&#8217;d be nice to see them become involved.</li>
<li>Jermichael Finley just keep doing what he&#8217;s been doing.</li>
<p><span id="more-2667"></span></p>
<li>A clear-cut winner emerge in the Quinn Porter-Kregg Lumpkin battle for the No. 3 running back spot. Both are injured and I&#8217;m not sure of either&#8217;s status. But at least one of them needs to suck it up and get through this &#8211; after all, an NFL job is on the line.</li>
<li>Matt Flynn build on his nice showing from the Seattle game. These next two games are potentially huge for his future if he wants to be an NFL starter someday.</li>
<li>Spencer Havner and/or Andrew Quarless make some big plays. The Pack are going to keep four tight ends, as much as that baffles me, so the bottom two might as well be good.</li>
<li>Breno Giacomini finally add some &#8220;Steak&#8221; to all the &#8220;Sizzle&#8221; the coaches have sold us on with him for the entire offseason. His future in Green Bay depends on it.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Defense</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Some</em> pass rush from <em>someone</em> in the starting unit. I know, I know &#8211; Green Bay may once again be without its entire starting linebacking corps (A.J. Hawk, Brad Jones, Clay Matthews and Nick Barnett). And I know that it&#8217;s really, really hard to get pressure on the great Peyton Manning. But whoever may happen to be starting on defense, it&#8217;s imperative that some form of a pass rush gets established here, just so the team can be more sure in that area heading into Philly on Sept. 12.</li>
<li>B.J. Raji get some real push up the middle. The big fella&#8217;s been solid, if unspectacular, during camp thus far. Let&#8217;s see a little spectacular tonight.</li>
<li>Cullen Jenkins join Jennings on the sidelines in sweats, please. That ankle has to be ready for the games that count.</li>
<li>Manning challenge Charles Woodson at least a couple of times, so we can see what really happens when two elite talents go right at each other.</li>
<li>Pat Lee and Brandon Underwood be less terrible than they were last week. With Woodson returning, these guys will draw the nickel and dime spots, respectively, and should get a good test against a deep Colts receiving corps.</li>
<li>Morgan Burnett do better. It&#8217;s time for him to start coming around a bit, rookie or not. And, even though it&#8217;s a game that doesn&#8217;t count, you know Manning will throw right at him.</li>
<li>Someone emerge at d-line from the group of Justin Harrell, C.J. Wilson and Jarius Wynn. A key spot in the rotation is there for the taking, fellas.</li>
<li>Sam Shields make some plays so he can shut all the doubters up. Come on, man &#8211; you&#8217;re &#8220;My Guy&#8221; for 2010 training camp. Don&#8217;t make me look silly.</li>
<li>Two words: More Zombo!</li>
</ul>
<p>Special Teams</p>
<ul>
<li>Mason Crosby keep doing what he&#8217;s been doing over the past 10 days.</li>
<li>Everyone else be much, much, much better in every single area. That is all.</li>
</ul>
<p>And, as usual, I&#8217;ll end this with the thing I&#8217;d like to see more than any of the rest: NO INJURIES!!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll be back afterwards to wrap it all up. Enjoy the game, everyone.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/08/26/what-id-like-to-see-from-packerscolts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Third game versus Peyton highlights Pack&#8217;s preseason slate</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/31/third-game-versus-peyton-highlights-packs-preseason-slate/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/31/third-game-versus-peyton-highlights-packs-preseason-slate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Hasselbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Holmgren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re still waiting for the announcement of the 2010 regular season schedule (something that should happen within the next two weeks), the Green Bay Packers found out who they&#8217;ll face in the preseason Wednesday afternoon.</p>
<p>The highlight of the schedule comes on Thursday, Aug. 26, as the Pack will battle Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re still waiting for the announcement of the 2010 regular season schedule (something that should happen within the next two weeks), the Green Bay Packers found out who they&#8217;ll face in the preseason Wednesday afternoon.</p>
<p>The highlight of the schedule comes on Thursday, Aug. 26, as the Pack will battle Peyton Manning and the Indianapolis Colts at Lambeau Field. The contest &#8211; this year&#8217;s Bishop Charities Game &#8211; is the all-important third preseason game (i.e., the one where the starters play the longest). The game will also be nationally televised and should provide at least a fleeting glimpse as to how much the pass defense has improved. Or something like that.</p>
<p>Green Bay begins its preseason slate at home, as well, with a game against the Cleveland Browns. The exact date is still unknown, but the contest will occur sometime during the weekend of Aug. 12-15. That game is this year&#8217;s Midwest Shrine Game (available to Gold Package ticket holders only). Mike Holmgren returns to Lambeau&#8230;for about the 20th time since he left&#8230;and he won&#8217;t be on the sidelines so you probably won&#8217;t even see him.</p>
<p>The Pack then heads to Seattle (sometime between Aug. 19-23) for their second preseason game. There&#8217;s at least a 50 percent chance Matt Hasselbeck won&#8217;t have injured himself yet and we&#8217;ll get an early glimpse at Pete Carroll&#8217;s transition back to pro coaching. Wait &#8211; I&#8217;m actually not sure either of those things is true.</p>
<p>After the game against the Colts, Green Bay closes things out on the road in Kansas City (either Sept. 2 or 3). This game is almost as big as the one against Manning and Co. First, the starters will play about 30 seconds each. And, good God, it&#8217;s against the powerhouse Chiefs, so I can&#8217;t imagine why you wouldn&#8217;t want to check this one out.</p>
<p>And, finally, if you think the somewhat bitter tone of this post stems from the way last year&#8217;s preseason went for the Pack &#8211; hot as a pistol before stumbling out of the gates in the regular season &#8211; well&#8230;you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/31/third-game-versus-peyton-highlights-packs-preseason-slate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OBOD Mock Draft: The sequel</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/16/obod-mock-draft-the-sequel/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/16/obod-mock-draft-the-sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Mock Drafts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFC North News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers Draft News & Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers News, Notes and Opinons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Kampman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aaron Rodgers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adalius Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amobi Okoye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anquan Boldin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antoine Winfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brady Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brandon Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Brohm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Cushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Orakpo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Bulaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C.J. Spiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calvin Pace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carlos Dunlap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cedric Griffin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chad Clifton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chike Okeafor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clark Haggans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corey Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sharper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derrick Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dez Bryant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Berry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everson Griffen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flozell Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald McCoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Dorsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haloti Ngata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamal Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Odrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Pierre-Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Hughes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Schwartz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Clausen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Haden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Peppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kameron Wimbley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karlos Dansby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Gregg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Vanden Bosch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Tauscher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurice Jones-Drew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurkice Pouncey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Holmgren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Iupati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Shanahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Singletary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ndamukong Suh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Carroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricky Sapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolando McClain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell Okung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Fitzpatrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Weatherspoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sergio Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.J. Lang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Mays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Cody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trent Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tyson Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vernon Gholston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walter Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that we are roughly 12 days into free agency, it seemed like the perfect time to run an updated mock draft.</p>
<p>(Plus, as you likely know, we LOVE doing mock drafts.)</p>
<p>Most of the &#8220;big fish&#8221; free agents have signed their respective deals and, as a result, some teams&#8217; draft plans have changed. Our new mock has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that we are roughly 12 days into free agency, it seemed like the perfect time to run an updated mock draft.</p>
<p>(Plus, as you likely know, we LOVE doing mock drafts.)</p>
<p>Most of the &#8220;big fish&#8221; free agents have signed their respective deals and, as a result, some teams&#8217; draft plans have changed. Our new mock has certainly taken those moves into account as there are some major changes from <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/02/first-obod-mock-draft-of-2010-hooray/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">our first mock</a>.</p>
<p>What are those changes? Well, let&#8217;s find out, shall we?</p>
<p>1. St. Louis Rams -  Sam Bradford, QB, Oklahoma. The biggest jump in this current mock belongs to Bradford (whom I previously had going to Buffalo at No. 9). Why the sudden rise? Well, from everything I&#8217;ve read, it just sounds like the St. Louis brass rather likes Bradford. Plus, it&#8217;s a lot easier to sell the selection of a quarterback No. 1 overall than it is a defensive tackle. I have my doubts about Bradford, but from a business standpoint, I can see where St. Louis is coming from.</p>
<p>2. Detroit Lions &#8211; Ndamukong Suh, DT, Nebraska. By signing Kyle Vanden Bosch and trading for Corey Williams, Detroit is definitely putting an emphasis on getting to the quarterback more. Those were both decent moves, but neither of those guys is a game-changer. Suh, on the other hand, surely could be. He&#8217;ll be NFL-ready from day one and could be head coach Jim Schwartz&#8217;s Haynesworth 2.0.</p>
<p>3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers &#8211; Eric Berry, S, Tennessee. While there is change with the top two picks, this song remains the same. In five years, Berry could very well end up the best defensive player to come out of this draft. Athletic, fast and rangy, he&#8217;s the type of do-it-all player who could make an impact on Tampa Bay&#8217;s defense right away. His playmaking numbers dipped a bit last season (just two picks as opposed to 12 combined in the two years previous), but don&#8217;t let that fool you. This kid&#8217;s for real.</p>
<p>4. Washington Redskins &#8211; Russell Okung, OT, Oklahoma State. Many analysts seem to think the &#8216;Skins will jump at Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen if he&#8217;s here. I disagree. New head coach Mike Shanahan has already said he wants Jason Campbell back. He&#8217;ll use 2010 to evaluate Campbell and see if he is, in fact, the future at quarterback. He&#8217;ll also give Campbell some added protection. Enter Okung, the most complete &#8211; and best &#8211; lineman in the draft.</p>
<p>5. Kansas City Chiefs &#8211; Gerald McCoy, DT, Oklahoma. My previous mock had the Chiefs going with Alabama linebacker Rolando McClain as Okung, McCoy and Suh were all already gone. This time around, McCoy is available and I can&#8217;t see how Kansas City passes on him. He&#8217;s not overly big (just 295 pounds), but has explosive pass rushing abilities. Sure, the Chiefs whiffed on Glenn Dorsey and Tyson Jackson didn&#8217;t do much as a rookie, but if they just keep taking d-tackles, one of them will hit, right? Maybe?<br />
<span id="more-1759"></span><br />
6. Seattle Seahawks &#8211; Bryan Bulaga, OT, Iowa. A replacement must be found for 35-year old Walter Jones. Originally, I had Rutgers&#8217; Anthony Davis as that guy. But Davis&#8217; weight issues and shaky combine (his character has come into question) make Bulaga the pick now. Some questions exist as to how high Bulaga&#8217;s ceiling really is. But the 6-feet, 6-inch, 312 pound Bulaga was also voted Big Ten Offensive Lineman of the Year last season. A couple of recent winners of that award, Jake Long and Joe Thomas, have done pretty well in the pros and Bulaga should follow suit.</p>
<p>7. Cleveland Browns &#8211; Joe Haden, CB, Florida. Another pick that has not changed since our first mock. The Brownies still need secondary help in a major way as they finished 29th in passing yards allowed per game (a whopping 244.7). Haden is, hands down, the best corner in the draft. He&#8217;s physical, aggressive and extremely fast and the Browns will jump at him here. Mike Holmgren will find his future quarterback later in the draft.</p>
<p>8. Oakland Raiders &#8211; Jason Pierre-Paul, OLB, South Florida. Yet another pick that has not changed, although this one is for different reasons, the biggest being I just do not want to climb into Al Davis&#8217; head and try to figure out what he&#8217;s going to do. I&#8217;m just not man enough for that mission. I know he loves measureables and Pierre-Paul has those in abundance (6-feet, 6-inches, 265 pounds and lightening fast). Pierre-Paul could team with Kameron Wimbley, recently acquired from Cleveland, at OLB for the Raiders.</p>
<p>9. Buffalo Bills &#8211; Jimmy Clausen, QB, Notre Dame. As they can no longer get Bradford here, the Bills will jump at Clausen. Why? Brian Brohm, Trent Edwards and Ryan Fitzpatrick, that&#8217;s why. That&#8217;s the quarterback group for the Bills as of now. None of those three bring any hope for the future, if you&#8217;re a Bills fan. And, as I said previously, that&#8217;s what Buffalo needs to give its fans here &#8211; some hope. Quite frankly, I have major doubts about Clausen as a pro, but I don&#8217;t doubt he&#8217;ll be the pick.</p>
<p>10. Jacksonville Jaguars &#8211; Dez Bryant, WR, Oklahoma State. Everyone had the Jags going defensive end here before they signed Aaron Kampman. I always thought they&#8217;d go with Bryant and, well, I still do. Simply put, Jacksonville hasn&#8217;t had a gamebreaking receiving threat since the days of Jimmy Smith. Well, those days are long gone. Bryant is an athletic, tough wideout with very good hands who could loosen the strain on Maurice Jones-Drew.</p>
<p>11. Denver Broncos &#8211; Rolando McClain, ILB, Alabama. Previously, I had Clausen going here. But, by acquiring Brady Quinn from Cleveland last weekend, Denver is no longer in the market for a quarterback (which is good because if things play out like I think, it couldn&#8217;t get one here anyways). The Jamal Williams signing beefs up the Broncos&#8217; d-line, but they still have holes in the second level. McClain can remedy that as he is an absolute beast, particularly in stuffing the run.</p>
<p>12. Miami Dolphins &#8211; Brian Price, DT, UCLA. Nose tackle was a position of need for the Dolphins <em>before</em> 35-year old Jason Ferguson was suspended for the first eight games of the season (performance-enhancing drugs). Now, of course, it&#8217;s even more so, and I still think Price is the guy here. Price is similar in size &#8211; Ferguson&#8217;s 310 pounds and Price is 300 &#8211; and the Pac 10 Defensive Player of the Year also has the explosion to get into the backfield on passing downs. He&#8217;ll open things up for newly acquired ILB Karlos Dansby.</p>
<p>13. San Francisco 49ers &#8211; Anthony Davis, OT, Rutgers. Yes, the issues surrounding Davis aren&#8217;t necessarily good. But he&#8217;s also a 6-feet, 6-inch, 325 pound monster who is looked at by many as the best pass protecting lineman in the draft. In other words, his equally large upside will prevent him from falling as far as some analysts think. Plus, something tells me Mike Singletary can keep this guy in line. Just a hunch. </p>
<p>14. Seattle Seahawks (from Broncos) &#8211; C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson. With the combine Spiller had, Pete Carroll and Co. will be doing backflips if he&#8217;s still available here. A dual threat back, Spiller could be Pete&#8217;s new Reggie Bush (hopefully, minus the whole Kardashian thing). By nabbing Bulaga and Spiller, the Seahawks will have cleared up two of their biggest issues (offensive line and a lack of gamebreakers).</p>
<p>15. New York Giants &#8211; Dan Williams, DT, Tennessee. After chatting with my good friend (and huge Giants fan) Matt Anderson, I&#8217;m convinced New York will attempt to move up if it feels it&#8217;s in danger of losing McClain. But, since I&#8217;m not going to predict any trades here, I&#8217;ll stick with Big Blue selecting Williams. New York&#8217;s d-line wasn&#8217;t as good as many (myself included) thought it would be before last season. At 325 pounds and strong as a bull, Williams could go a long way towards fixing that.</p>
<p>16. Tennessee Titans &#8211; Derrick Morgan, DE/OLB, Georgia Tech. Originally, I had the Titans addressing some of their needs along the o-line with Idaho&#8217;s Mike Iupati. But after losing Vanden Bosch, I now think Tennessee turns to the defensive front, where it struggled last season without Fat Albert. At 275 pounds, Morgan is right on the fence as far as where he can play in the pros (depending on whether or not he adds weight). With 12 sacks and two forced fumbles last season, Morgan could replace Vanden Bosch in a major way.</p>
<p>17. San Francisco 49ers (from Panthers) &#8211; Earl Thomas, S, Texas. Having already upgraded at o-line with Davis, the Niners now turn their focus to finding a big-time playmaking safety in the secondary. Thomas&#8217; size (5-feet, 10-inches, just under 200 pounds) isn&#8217;t exactly what you&#8217;d like at that position. But his numbers (63 tackles, eight interceptions last season) and speed definitely are. By taking Davis and Thomas, the Niners would walk away with a very nice first round haul.</p>
<p>18. Pittsburgh Steelers &#8211; Mike Iupati, OG, Idaho. Previously, Maryland&#8217;s Bruce Campbell was the pick here. But there are some fairly significant question marks on Campbell &#8211; like, if he&#8217;s so good, why did he receive no votes for All ACC-First Team last season? - and I think he&#8217;ll drop a good deal as a result. Still, the Steelers need o-line help badly. The 6-feet, 5-inch, 330 pound Iupati has the strength to be able to play, and flourish, right away. He could end up being very. very good. A typical Steeler pick.</p>
<p>19. Atlanta Falcons &#8211; Sergio Kindle, DE/OLB, Texas. With Morgan &#8211; the player I previously had them taking &#8211; off the board, the Falcons will turn to Kindle. At 255 pounds, he&#8217;ll play outside linebacker in Atlanta&#8217;s 4-3 scheme and he should be very good at that spot. He&#8217;s got great athleticism, knows how to get to the quarterback and could be for the Falcons what Brian Orakpo was for the &#8216;Skins last season.</p>
<p>20. Houston Texans &#8211; Jared Odrick, DT, Penn State. I&#8217;m not sensing much change at this spot for Houston. As usual, the Texans are set, offensively. Again, as usual, their defense still needs more work if they are to finally get over the top and into the playoffs. Last year&#8217;s first rounder, linebacker Brian Cushing, was the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year, but the team still needs one or two more pieces. Odrick (306 pounds with seven sacks last year) could very well be the nose tackle to open things up for Mario Williams and Amobi Okoye.</p>
<p>21. Cincinnati Bengals &#8211; Maurkice Pouncey, C, Florida. Believe it or not, I actually left the Bengals off my first mock draft. I&#8217;m not sure how that happened, but if you&#8217;re a Bengals fan reading this, I am very sorry. Anyways, Cincinnati has major needs on the offensive line, particularly at center and guard. Lucky for them, Pouncey can play either of those spots in the pros. He&#8217;s also intelligent and plays with a mean streak that the Bengals&#8217; offense sorely lacks.</p>
<p>22. New England Patriots &#8211; Brandon Graham, DE/OLB, Michigan. The Pats did not, as some expected, end up with Julius Peppers. They also cut Adalius Thomas, making outside linebacker a huge priority. Truth be told, I think Kindle will be a better pro, but Graham is not a bad consolation prize at all. Over his last three seasons at Michigan, Graham averaged over nine sacks a season, with ever-improving tackle numbers. He&#8217;s got short arms, yes, but he&#8217;s also a hard-worker who comes at you on every play. The Hoodie will love this guy.</p>
<p>23. Green Bay Packers &#8211; Charles Brown, OT, USC. Since this is a Packers&#8217; blog, I&#8217;ll go a little more in-depth here. The re-signings of Chad Clifton/Mark Tauscher, at first, had me thinking Ted Thompson might go in a different direction with this pick (i.e., defense). But when I thought about it more, I still think the team has to nab a left tackle of the future. Clifton could break down at any minute and, while we all love T.J. Lang, I&#8217;m beginning to think he&#8217;s strictly a right tackle. The Packers need someone who can step in if Clifton goes down (which you know he will, if only for a game or two at a time). At just 290 pounds, Brown must bulk up a bit before he&#8217;s game ready. But his athleticism and NFL-ready pass protection skills would cover him if forced to play right away. He&#8217;s got a ton of upside and could protect Aaron Rodgers&#8217; blindside for the next decade. At some point, this move has to be made. Why not here?</p>
<p>24. Philadelphia Eagles &#8211; Everson Griffen, DE, USC. Having whiffed on Kampman and Julius Peppers, the Eagles look to the draft to find their pass rushing end of the future. Previously, I had them going to Graham, but since he&#8217;s no longer available, they&#8217;ll go with Griffen. Not always the most motivated player, Griffen is still blessed with great athleticism and pass rushing skills. If the Eagles can keep a fire under his butt, he should be a productive player.</p>
<p>25. Baltimore Ravens &#8211; Carlos Dunlap, DT, Florida. Baltimore&#8217;s trade for wide receiver Anquan Boldin took care of its need for a big-time playmaker not named Ray Rice. That being the case, the Ravens will focus on d-line with this pick. Kelly Gregg is still very good, but will turn 34 during the season and the team needs to find a player to team up with Haloti Ngata for the future. There are some questions surrounding Dunlap (lack of motivation and a DUI arrest in particular). But he&#8217;s also had nine sacks in each of the past two seasons.</p>
<p>26. Arizona Cardinals &#8211; Jerry Hughes, DE/OLB, TCU. Having lost Dansby, you could argue that the Cards should go inside linebacker here. But since there are no real ILBs worth taking at this spot, they&#8217;ll stick with Hughes (whom I had them taking in our original mock). Clark Haggans and Chike Okeafor are both aging and merely decent and, with 26 sacks over his final two years at TCU, Hughes has shown a knack for getting to the quarterback.</p>
<p>27. Dallas Cowboys &#8211; Trent Williams, OT, Oklahoma. Again, I&#8217;m sticking with what worked the first time here. Flozell Adams, for all the hype and money, just isn&#8217;t very consistent in pass protection. Plus, he&#8217;s getting older, so the team needs to upgrade there for the future. Williams would have gone much higher if not for his subpar 2009 season, but he still has a lot of tools and could be a good pro, if he regains his 2008 form.</p>
<p>28. San Diego Chargers &#8211; Terrence Cody, DT, Alabama. In our first mock, I said this pick &#8220;could be surprising&#8221; considering the Bolts, at that point, still had Jamal Williams. Seeing as though Williams got cut (and signed with Denver), this pick is no longer a shock. In fact, it makes a lot of sense. San Diego needs its next Williams and &#8220;Mount Cody&#8221; could be just that, provided he stays motivated and keeps his weight down. Remember, Cody dominated for long stretches in the toughest conference in the country.</p>
<p>29. New York Jets &#8211; Sean Weatherspoon, OLB, Missouri. The names change (previously I had Clemson&#8217;s Ricky Sapp here), but the position remains the same. Like I said before, it&#8217;s time for New York to just suck it up and admit that Vernon Gholston is a bust and find someone else to go opposite Calvin Pace at OLB. Weatherspoon is not the biggest linebacker, at just 245 pounds, but like his good buddy Clay Matthews, he&#8217;s an intense, non-stop player who is good in mulitple facets. He was a leader for Mizzou&#8217;s defense and you can never have too many of those.</p>
<p>30. Minnesota Vikings &#8211; Kyle Wilson, CB, Boise State. With the Williams sisters still on trial (and possible facing four-game suspensions), Minnesota could very well look d-tackle here. But with all of the first-round tackles already gone, the Vikings turn their attention to cornerback. Good idea as Antoine Winfield is getting older and Cedric Griffin could miss the first six weeks due to his torn ACL. Wilson is a bit small at 5-feet, 9-inches, but is an aggressive, playmaking corner.</p>
<p>31. Indianapolis Colts &#8211; Bruce Campbell, OT, Maryland. Charlie Johnson was serviceable at left tackle last season, but is far from the long-term solution there. As I previously mentioned, there are some big questions surrounding Campbell. But he is also a freak, physically (6-feet, 7-inches, 310 pounds, with a sub-4.8 40 time). In fact, some think he&#8217;s got the most upside of any lineman in the draft. After a year of learning, he could protect Peyton Manning&#8217;s blindside for the rest of Manning&#8217;s career.</p>
<p>32. New Orleans Saints &#8211; Taylor Mays, S, USC. Darren Sharper&#8217;s knee injury/contract demands place his future in New Orleans in doubt. The team needs someone who can play right away in the event Sharper walks and that player could be Mays. Before last season, it would have been unthinkable to have him this low. But a bad 2009 season (just one interception) and doubts about his ceiling land him here. Still, Mays brings great value at this spot.</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/03/16/obod-mock-draft-the-sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLIV recap: Who dat rides aggressive Payton and near-perfect Brees to championship (plus some other thoughts)</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-recap-who-dat-rides-aggressive-payton-and-near-perfect-brees-to-championship-plus-some-other-thoughts/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-recap-who-dat-rides-aggressive-payton-and-near-perfect-brees-to-championship-plus-some-other-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boomer Esiason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Marino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Wayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Payton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tracy Porter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(Before we begin: I wasn&#8217;t going to write a recap of this game at first. Then I realized that we&#8217;re roughly nine months away from the next meaningful NFL game. That changed my mind.)</p>
<p>The Who Dat? Nation has finally reached the top of the mountain.</p>
<p>They did so as the New Orleans Saints pulled off a dramatic 31-17 upset of the Indianapolis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Before we begin: I wasn&#8217;t going to write a recap of this game at first. Then I realized that we&#8217;re roughly nine months away from the next meaningful NFL game. That changed my mind.)</p>
<p>The Who Dat? Nation has finally reached the top of the mountain.</p>
<p>They did so as the New Orleans Saints pulled off a dramatic 31-17 upset of the Indianapolis Colts in Super Bowl XLIV on Sunday night in Miami.</p>
<p>Since plenty of other commentators have weighed in on what this means, not just to the Saints but to the city of New Orleans as a whole, I&#8217;m going to focus strictly on the game itself. There&#8217;s plenty of enough to talk about there, anyways.</p>
<p>The Saints&#8217; turnaround from &#8220;Aints&#8221; to champions was keyed by two people &#8211; head coach Sean Payton and quarterback Drew Brees &#8211; and it&#8217;s really no surprise those two were the reasons the Saints were victorious Sunday.</p>
<p>(Just a quick, completely uncalled for reminder: Vikings&#8217; fans STILL have no idea what this feels like)</p>
<p>Payton rebounded from his conservative approach in the NFC title game two weeks ago on Sunday with a masterfully aggressive gameplan. It wasn&#8217;t always smart and it didn&#8217;t always work &#8211; the decision to go for it on fourth-and-goal late in the second quarter was baffling, to say the least &#8211; but by being aggressive, he showed his team he had confidence in them at every single turn. In sports, that stuff matters.</p>
<p>It certainly mattered on the opening kickoff of the second half.</p>
<p>Payton and Co. shocked the nation by going for an onside kick. After a lengthy pile-up (which had to have been the craziest pile ever), the Saints came away with not only the ball, but the momentum. And when Brees led the offense down for a score &#8211; giving the Saints a 13-10 lead &#8211; it was official that, no matter what Indianapolis did to counter that, the Colts would be behind the cliched eight-ball the rest of the way.</p>
<p>In the biggest games of your life, you turn it loose. Payton did just that.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s easy to turn it loose when you have a signal-caller like Brees.</p>
<p>As Adam said in giving his prediction, New Orleans&#8217; hopes would rest on Brees&#8217; shoulders. By going 32-of-39 for 288 yards and two touchdowns (no interceptions), Brees showed he was more than up to the task, turning in the closest thing a quarterback can to a perfect game. Playing behind a dominant offensive line (seriously, was he pressured more than a handful of times?), the game&#8217;s MVP found every single open patch in Indianapolis&#8217; Cover 2 defense. He spread the ball around to eight different receivers and showed that, if anyone doubts he should be considered the game&#8217;s best quarterback, they should doubt no more.</p>
<p>Payton and Brees have become the league&#8217;s elite coach-quarterback combo. When you have that, more often that not, you&#8217;re going to be the best.</p>
<p>The Saints were Sunday. And it&#8217;s absolutely deserved.</p>
<p><strong>Other random thoughts on the Super Bowl</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Peyton Manning had his chance to become the best quarterback ever in this one and he blew it. Sure, he completed over 66 percent of his passes for 333 yards, but it was a very non-discript 333 yards. And with the game hanging the balance, Manning made a terrible throw to Reggie Wayne that Tracy Porter (officially my favorite non-Packer) picked and took to the house for the game-clinching score. Manning is still top 10, but he&#8217;s nowhere close to where he could have been (plus, Brees has surpassed him as the best in the game today). Somewhere, Joe Montana is smiling. His status as the best ever is safe.</li>
<li>I tried to tell you The Who should be stopped. If you doubted me then, you can&#8217;t now after watching their abysmal halftime performance. They just can&#8217;t get it done anymore. Can we officially declare the 1960s are over, for God&#8217;s sake? Can the NFL get a band that actually, you know, appeals to its target demograpic (me, for example)? How about Pearl Jam? Or Kings of Leon, maybe? Why does the halftime show always have to be classic rock radio?</li>
<li>Sort of a down year for the commercials. That said, I had two favorites (for different reasons). The funniest was the David Letterman/Oprah/Jay Leno promo for Letterman&#8217;s show. Hilarious. The best was the Megan Fox ad for&#8230;well, I don&#8217;t even know what it was for. Megan Fox in a tub? Yikes. Here&#8217;s how you know it made an impact. Adam and I were having a conversation. We stopped when the commercial came on. When it was over, I said, &#8220;What were we talking about?&#8221; He stared blankly at me before responding, &#8220;I can&#8217;t remember.&#8221; That&#8217;s the effect Fox has on men. I doubt we were the only guys experiencing this.</li>
<li>I love, love, love that Boomer Esiason and Dan Marino were the two former quarterbacks-turned analysts for CBS&#8217; halftime show. Two guys who know a little something about Super Bowl-winning quarterbacking right there. They know as much as you and I do about that.</li>
<li>Esiason had another gem, too, when talking about Brees holding his recently-born son on the field after the game was over. Esiason: &#8220;It&#8217;s really a great moment between a father and son.&#8221; He said it as though <em>every</em> father and son experiences that. Yeah, I remember when my dad and I did that after he won it back in &#8216;81. We talk about it all the time. And, again, what would YOU know about that anyways, Boomer?</li>
<li>Next year, the Super Bowl is in Dallas. How &#8217;bout the Pack goes down there and wins it, shoving it right in Jerry Jones&#8217; cosmetically-altered face? How fun would that be? Just saying&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/08/super-bowl-xliv-recap-who-dat-rides-aggressive-payton-and-near-perfect-brees-to-championship-plus-some-other-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the winner of Super Bowl XLIV will be&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/07/and-the-winner-of-super-bowl-xliv-will-be/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/07/and-the-winner-of-super-bowl-xliv-will-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adam Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL history lessons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sharper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Freeney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gregg Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jabari Greer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jospeh Addai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierre Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raheem Brock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Wayne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Indianapolis Colts.</p>
<p>And the final score will be 34-24.</p>
<p>And the Super Bowl MVP will be not Peyton Manning, but Dallas Clark.</p>
<p>And he will have 9 catches for 142 yards and two touchdowns.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s to no one&#8217;s surprise that I picked the Colt&#8217;s after I admitted to the world my man crush on Peyton Manning.  I am [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Indianapolis Colts.</p>
<p>And the final score will be 34-24.</p>
<p>And the Super Bowl MVP will be not Peyton Manning, but Dallas Clark.</p>
<p>And he will have 9 catches for 142 yards and two touchdowns.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s to no one&#8217;s surprise that I picked the Colt&#8217;s after I admitted to the world my <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/05/why-its-cool-to-cheer-for-peyton-manning/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">man crush</a> on Peyton Manning.  I am actually a little surprised that Chris didn&#8217;t try to make up his <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2009/09/08/2009-nfl-predictions-i-e-where-i-make-myself-look-like-a-fool/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">Nostradamus-like pick</a> of his Tennessee Titans by going with the Saints and hoping for the best.  To have the record show, prior to the year in a small circle amongst friends, including Chris, I picked the Colts to win the Super Bowl and the Titans to miss the playoffs entirely.  Being the unified voice that OBOD is, we went the Titans and I am still shaking my head to this moment.</p>
<p>After reading the Super Bowl previews from both <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/a-look-at-and-prediction-for-super-bowl-xliv/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">Chris </a>and <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/super-bowl-xliv-my-thoughts/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">Gene</a>, there really isn&#8217;t anything left for me to say that they didn&#8217;t cover.  Both did bang-up jobs of breaking down the game (eat your heart out <a href="http://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing" target="_blank">Peter King</a>), so I am going to try to pick up a couple table scraps and explain why I think the Colts win by two scores that doesn&#8217;t involve Manning.</p>
<p>First, who is going to cover Dallas Clark?  If Visanthe Shiancoe gave the Saints problems last week, Clark could be an absolute nightmare tonight.  Reggie Wayne steals a lot of the attention, but it is basically Clark, not Wayne, who has replaced Marvin Harrison.  Check out these identical stats.</p>
<p>Wayne: 100 rec, 1264 yards, 12.6 avg, 10 TD</p>
<p>Clark:  100 rec, 1106 yards, 11.1 avg, 10 TD</p>
<p>Jabari Greer can probably hold his own against Wayne, but it is Clark who will present a tremendous matchup problem for Gregg Williams.  The X-factor is Darren Sharper.  He may be the best Clark-kryptonite the Saints have, but he will then be forced to leave his ball-hawking centerfield position in game where turnovers will be critical for a Saints upset.</p>
<p>My second point why the Colts will win is the running game.  A lot of Manning&#8217;s success comes from playaction.  I expect the Colts to coming out running, not passing early.  Looking beyond his fumbles, Adrian &#8220;All Thumbs&#8221; Peterson ripped up the Saints run defense pretty good a couple weeks ago.  Joseph Addai is not Peterson, but Manning is not Brett Favre.  The Colts don&#8217;t need a 140 yards from Addai, but more like 75 yards, enough to get the playaction going.  If they are successful with that the Saints secondary will be on their heels the whole game.</p>
<p>On the flip side, Pierre Thomas could be the key for a Saints upset.  The Colts defense is predicated on speed, which in my opinion will make Reggie Bush a non-factor.  But what if the Saints come out and pound the ball with Thomas right at Dwight Freeney and Raheem Brock?  The Colts are not great against the run (24th in the NFL), but have righted the ship some in the playoffs.  However, the Colts have to respect Drew Brees, unlike Joe Flacco or Mark Sanchez.  The Saints cannot go conservative like they did against the Vikings, but if they success running the ball, it could give Brees enough time to exploit any mismatches down field.</p>
<p>I do believe the Saints can win and as it should, the game will rest of the shoulders of their best player, Brees.  However, actually winning is a different story.  Brees will play well, but I think Manning plays better.  Either an early turnover or the Saints inability to get Manning off the field will lead to an early hole for the Saints, which will feel like the abyss against Manning.  Chris is right saying that if the Saints force a shootout they have a chance because they are best-equipped team in the league in playing from behind.  However, on the other side ol&#8217; corral is Manning, who will have just one more round in the chamber than Brees.</p>
<p><em>-Adam Somers</em></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr align="right">
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr align="right">
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/07/and-the-winner-of-super-bowl-xliv-will-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl XLIV: My thoughts</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/super-bowl-xliv-my-thoughts/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/super-bowl-xliv-my-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brett Favre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sharper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Peyton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Who]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First, let&#8217;s get a few things out of the way:</p>
<p>&#8211;Adam&#8217;s piece on changing your view of Peyton Manning really resonated with me. I&#8217;ve always been a Manning hater, but as the Colts have made this Super Bowl run, I&#8217;ve found myself less and less bothered by him. Here&#8217;s why: In Manning&#8217;s last Super Bowl, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let&#8217;s get a few things out of the way:</p>
<p>&#8211;Adam&#8217;s <a href="http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/05/why-its-cool-to-cheer-for-peyton-manning/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed" target="_blank">piece</a> on changing your view of Peyton Manning really resonated with me. I&#8217;ve always been a Manning hater, but as the Colts have made this Super Bowl run, I&#8217;ve found myself less and less bothered by him. Here&#8217;s why: In Manning&#8217;s last Super Bowl, I was clinging to the small hope that he <em>wouldn&#8217;t</em> pass Brett Favre in the record books and unseat him as the greatest quarterback of all time. Well, when Favre went turncoat on us, my view on quarterback legacies was returned to a saner realm, and I realized that Favre cannot compete with Manning, or a handful of other quarterbacks, for the title of greatest ever. He&#8217;s probably in the top five, but his playoff follies knock him to the edge of that list, and Manning has a chance to blast all of his records. Manning&#8217;s a better quarterback than Favre. That distinction is only going to get clearer. And I&#8217;m OK with that now.</p>
<p>&#8211;That said, if you&#8217;re a Packers fan, you should root for the Saints for several reasons. First, we owe them &#8212; really, the entire nation owes them &#8212; a debt of gratitude for sparing us two weeks of &#8220;the Brett Favre fairytale,&#8221; and ending that farce in such <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2Iw2YejS9A" target="_blank">hilarious</a> fashion. Well, maybe they were bumming in Bristol, Conn. But if Manning burnished his legacy two Sundays ago, Favre shot another hole in his. Second, I&#8217;m a firm believer in rooting for the NFC team, unless there&#8217;s a legitimate reason not to (like if the Vikings, Bears, Cowboys or Lio&#8230;OK, maybe only the first two scenarios are possible). Third, the city of New Orleans deserves it.</p>
<p>&#8211;Side note: If you&#8217;re the Saints, and you win, do you say, &#8220;Screw it, we&#8217;re not going to visit Obama. We&#8217;re taking this thing to Crawford, Texas, and celebrating on W&#8217;s front lawn. And then when he comes out, we say to him, &#8216;You left our city for dead, but look at us now!&#8217;&#8221; Just a thought&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211;And one more thing: I know it&#8217;s the Colts, and I know it&#8217;s Miami again, but this Super Bowl halftime show has NO CHANCE of being as cool as the last Colts-in-Miami halftime show. Prince, in the rain, playing &#8220;Purple Rain?&#8221; Come on. I love &#8220;Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again,&#8221; but nothing The Who does tomorrow will measure up to that. Although, there is a little humor in the fact that Prince wrote that God-awful song for the Vikings (I&#8217;m not linking to it, because I like Prince too much to acknowledge its existence), and now his adopted team fell short of making it to the stadium where Prince put on the second-greatest Super Bowl halftime show of my life (just behind U2, just ahead of Michael Jackson).</p>
<p>OK, enough of my Bill Simmons impersonation. On to the game:</p>
<p>The key to beating the Colts, obviously, is controlling Peyton Manning, and as Chris said, the teams that have done that usually have done it by disguising coverages and confusing Manning at the line. The Patriots have done it in the past, and the Packers did it last season. But it&#8217;s going to mean a Saints secondary with depth issues playing above their heads for four quarters. This is where Darren Sharper comes in; he&#8217;s best when he&#8217;s unpredictable, and him being unpredictable is going to be a big part of the Saints&#8217; game plan. If they can create a couple turnovers, it&#8217;s conceivable the Saints might have enough leeway to keep up with the Colts.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll agree with Chris again as it relates to the Saints&#8217; offense. I don&#8217;t know why a team that prides itself on aggressiveness became so conservative in the NFC Championship Game (maybe too much time with Brad Childress polluted Sean Peyton&#8217;s brain?). But that can&#8217;t happen again in the Super Bowl. They need to stay aggressive against the Colts and keep the pressure on Manning to answer. They don&#8217;t have the luxury of playing a quarterback as mistake-prone as Favre, and they won&#8217;t be able to afford the long lulls in production they had against the Vikings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be an entertaining game, but in the end, I don&#8217;t think the Saints have enough defensively to stop Manning.</p>
<p><strong>Final score: </strong>Colts 31, Saints 27.</p>
<p><em>&#8211;Gene Bosling</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/super-bowl-xliv-my-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A look at (and prediction for) Super Bowl XLIV</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/a-look-at-and-prediction-for-super-bowl-xliv/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/a-look-at-and-prediction-for-super-bowl-xliv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chris Lempesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL News and Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Sanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Sharper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drew Brees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reggie Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Payton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>At last, it&#8217;s almost here.</p>
<p>Soon, there will be no more hype. No more injury reports. No more analysis. No more rumors of some band claiming to call themselves The Who playing the halftime show.</p>
<p>Seriously, fellas, you need to stop. You&#8217;re killing all of us.</p>
<p>Soon, Super Bowl XLIV will be upon us, with the Indianapolis Colts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last, it&#8217;s almost here.</p>
<p>Soon, there will be no more hype. No more injury reports. No more analysis. No more rumors of some band claiming to call themselves The Who playing the halftime show.</p>
<p>Seriously, fellas, you need to stop. You&#8217;re killing <em>all of us</em>.</p>
<p>Soon, Super Bowl XLIV will be upon us, with the Indianapolis Colts and New Orleans Saints battling it out to determine the world champions. But, since it&#8217;s not quite time yet, I figured I&#8217;d weigh in with my thoughts on the game. There&#8217;s a good chance Adam and Gene will give their respective thoughts and predictions rather shortly, so make sure to check back for those.</p>
<p>(Quick aside: You might have noticed that I stopped doing the weekly &#8220;Breaking down&#8230;&#8221; posts right after the week of the Cowboys game, way back in mid-November. The reason for that was simple: The Packers were on a winning streak. And you don&#8217;t you-know-what with a winning streak. Like I&#8217;ve said before, I&#8217;m superstitious to an astounding degree.)</p>
<p>Since pretty much everyone on the planet is picking the Colts &#8211; currently a five-point favorite the last time I checked &#8211; I&#8217;m going to use this post to try and answer a simple question: How do the Saints go about winning Sunday?<br />
<span id="more-1571"></span><br />
When I really looked at it, I came up with the following five things (my prediction for the game will follow):</p>
<ol>
<li>Blitz Peyton Manning sparingly, if at all. Yes, yes &#8211; I know this goes against the standard football logic that says you have to pressure a great quarterback if you want to throw him off his game. But with the way Manning&#8217;s playing, you have to throw that logic out the window. Instead, the Saints need to take a page out of &#8211; brace yourselves &#8211; Bob Sanders&#8217; playbook. Shocking, I know, but remember what Sanders did against Manning last season while he was still defensive coordinator of the Packers? He did what he always did: Swept four and dropped seven into coverage (with very little blitzing). It worked perfectly as Manning was never quite comfortable with all those defenders roaming in the secondary. Manning finished just 21-of-42 for 229 yards, with no touchdowns and two interceptions as Green Bay romped to a 34-14 win. With his lightening-fast delivery and knowledge of every blitz possible, Manning leaves you almost no chance to sack him, anyways. So you have to play the odds and throw as many bodies into coverage as you can and just hope someone makes a play. With players like Darren Sharper in their secondary, the Saints could do it.</li>
<li>Get physical with the receivers &#8211; very physical. Obviously, the Colts have a very good offense. But theirs is a finesse offense (as is the case with almost every dome team). This is especially true with regards to their receivers. Again, they&#8217;re very good, but I don&#8217;t see much physicality in that group. So you jam them, you press them &#8211; hell, you flat-out grab them off-the-snap if you have to. You might draw a penalty, yes, but you will also begin to frustrate them. That, in tune, will frustrate Manning (believe it or not, I still think that&#8217;s possible). The Colts are not necessarily a vertical offense; they rely heavily on short-and-intermediate stuff. Being physical with the pass-catchers cuts down on the timing you need to run those routes.</li>
<li>Do not let the Colts run the ball early on. This one&#8217;s simple: If the Colts can run early, Manning can playaction frequently. If that happens, game over.</li>
<li>Sean Payton: Don&#8217;t forget what got you here. Like everyone else, I was stunned at how conservative Payton became during the course of the NFC Championship Game. He took the ball out of Drew Brees&#8217; hands and decided the Saints were going to become a ball-control offense. That&#8217;s not how the Saints won 13 games in the regular season and it almost caused them to lose to the Vikings. Get back to what you to best. Put Brees in the shotgun and let him wing it all over the yard. You&#8217;re going to need at least 35 points to win this one, Sean, and running on first-and-second down won&#8217;t do that for you.</li>
<li>Make Reggie Bush the focal point of your offense, especially early. With just nine total offensive touches for 41 yards (and a score), Bush was a glaring non-factor in the Vikings&#8217; game. That can&#8217;t happen again Sunday. We can talk all we want about how Bush just hasn&#8217;t been the pro we all thought he&#8217;d be, but the fact remains: When he makes plays, the whole team is lifted (and opponents get the wind kicked out of them). He can break the game open Sunday, but he&#8217;ll need the ball way more than nine times for that to happen. The Saints should be aiming more for the 15-20 touch range and if that happens, you can almost guarantee Bush will break something.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Prediction</strong></p>
<p>Unlike a lot of people, I really believe the Saints have a shot to win this one. After all, their offense is no shrinking violet and their defense, while certainly not great, can produce turnovers at key moments (see: the end of regulation in the Vikings&#8217; game). With the way the Colts are playing, that might just be the only formula you can beat them with: Score, score, score and just hope for a turnover at some point. The Jets tried a gameplan based around running and defense and it worked &#8211; for less than a half. The Saints have to be thinking shootout. The only problem there is&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re getting into a shootout with, arguably, the greatest quarterback ever &#8211; which I think Manning becomes with a win Sunday &#8211; playing the best ball of his career. Everytime I look at this game, that&#8217;s all I keep coming back to: He&#8217;s one win away from possibly being the best ever. How does he let that moment pass him by? Sure, he&#8217;s had some playoff stinkers in the past, but he&#8217;s just so close now. And when the great ones are that close, they usually don&#8217;t slip up.</p>
<p>And Manning won&#8217;t slip Sunday.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction:</strong> Indianapolis Colts 38, New Orleans Saints 31</p>
<p>-<em>Chris Lempesis</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/06/a-look-at-and-prediction-for-super-bowl-xliv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why it&#8217;s &#8216;cool&#8217; to cheer for Peyton Manning</title>
		<link>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/05/why-its-cool-to-cheer-for-peyton-manning/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/05/why-its-cool-to-cheer-for-peyton-manning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adam Somers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outside the division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peyton Manning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olbagofdonuts.com/?p=1557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the next few days Chris, Gene and I will give our picks and prognostications on Super Bowl XLIV, but I wanted to touch on a subject that has been stuck in my crawl for quite sometime and it involves my favorite non-Packer in the NFL: Peyton Manning.  Maybe I talk to the wrong people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the next few days Chris, Gene and I will give our picks and prognostications on Super Bowl XLIV, but I wanted to touch on a subject that has been stuck in my crawl for quite sometime and it involves my favorite non-Packer in the NFL: Peyton Manning.  Maybe I talk to the wrong people and monitor the wrong social media channels, but I have long gotten the impression that people are growing sick of Manning.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>One could argue the fact that he is in more advertisements than all other NFL players combined, which is true.  But wasn&#8217;t it the same for Michael Jordan?  What about (pre-scandal) Tiger Woods?  Derek Jeter?  The players who dominate their sports usually dominate advertising and marketing.  Remember when Favre was <strong>everywhere </strong>when he was in prime from a non-news standpoint?  Sure, Manning&#8217;s face is all over, but honestly there isn&#8217;t a vast lot of marketable NFL players in 2010.</p>
<p>People may be growing tired of him because of his &#8216;aww shucks&#8217; demeanor and he is kind of dull.  Well, would you rather have a good, clean, but dull Manning or say an exciting, flashy, but controversial player like Terrel Owens?  Everyone loves someone who charismatic, but today it comes with a double-edged sword for most players.  I still think the greatest celebration or insult you can give him an opponent after a big play is just acting like you been there before and it&#8217;s no big deal.  Greats like Starr, Montana, Rice all did that and Manning does that as well.</p>
<p>Maybe the reason is that people are just sick of him always winning and breaking records?  If that is the case, my response is simple &#8211; grow up.  When did it become &#8216;uncool&#8217; to cheer for someone who is successful?  I am not expecting Patriots or Titans fans to cheer for Manning or if the Packers play the Colts I am going to secretly hope Peyton does well because that is lunacy.  However, if your team isn&#8217;t a rival with the Colts or has them on their schedule this week you should consider it &#8216;cool&#8217; to cheer Manning and be honored to be able to watch what will be one of the top-5 quarterbacks play when it is all said and done.</p>
<p>This season more than any other showed the greatness of Manning with no running game, unknown depth at receiver, new head coach, etc.  All he does his lead his team to a 14-0 start, en route to a Super Bowl.  There has never been anyone greater in game preparation to the point that he is literally an on-field coach.  No one in the history of the game calls plays at the line like Manning and while he has done it for years it still astonishes me.</p>
<p>Since Manning is the best quarterback in the game, playing on the best team, maybe this makes me bandwagon-ish and I really don&#8217;t care if it does.  I&#8217;m not going to run out and buy a #18 jersey or new Colts stocking cap, I just like watching winners.  Guys like Manning are good for sports.  They are leaders, teachers and role-models.  They make it easy for us to root for them and there isn&#8217;t anything wrong with that.</p>
<p>However, when is comes the age that it isn&#8217;t cool to cheer for highly successful players or programs that are not your own?  Remember when most of us were younger, we all had Michael Jordan posters up on are walls and that was fine because we were innocent kids.  But as we got into our teenage years, through college and even into adulthood, it isn&#8217;t easy cheering for the best player or team in the game, if they aren&#8217;t your own, in front of your buddies.</p>
<p>Now, this doesn&#8217;t apply cheering for your rivals if your team is out of the race, as that is just sacrilegious.  However, if you aren&#8217;t an alum from Florida St. or an SEC school, why hate on Tim Tebow and the Gators?  I get questioned by a few people close to me as I openly cheer for Tebow.  He&#8217;s had an outstanding career, a great teammate and leader by all accounts and doesn&#8217;t get into any trouble.  What is wrong with that?  I hate the excuse of &#8216;well he won&#8217;t make a good pro.&#8217;  I agree with that, but doesn&#8217;t mean you can&#8217;t root for a player like him to make it.  His stance on certain issues like abortion turn people off as well, but how rare is it these days for athletes to take a stance on any widespread important issues?</p>
<p>Staying in college football, why do people hate on Ohio St.?  I know this is a hard argument to cast in Big Ten country, but nationally people are down on Jim Tressel and the Buckeyes.  Yes, the vest is drab and Tressel doesn&#8217;t excite many fans or the media with his interviews, but he runs a pretty clean program, which is rare for big-time programs it seems, and gives every indication that he will in Columbus until he retires.  They may have choked in a couple title games, but I can&#8217;t hate on that.</p>
<p>Tim Duncan and the Spurs get a lot of the same flack as Manning and the Colts.  Too good and too boring.  When did championships become boring?  I can&#8217;t stand the NBA, but Duncan is one of <strong>maybe </strong>three players in league I would watch for more than two minutes because he is just great at his craft and doesn&#8217;t have to let the world know about.  I still have a vintage Wake Forest #21 jersey that always makes a few appearances on the beach in the summer months.</p>
<p>Chris (bitter Red Wings fan) will disagree with me, but Sidney Crosby is another great athlete that it is &#8216;cool&#8217; to root for.  For any of you out there who are big hockey fans like I am, watching Sid the Kid out there is a thing of pure art and is just as great off the ice.  Like Manning he is in every commercial for the league and for once the league got it right by making him the face of their marketing.  The Penguins are on national TV more times than not and that annoys people, but I don&#8217;t see why.  Crosby is one of the only chances the league has to expand it&#8217;s audience and even a big hockey rube like myself would rather watch Crosby dominate than a close Vancouver-Colorado game.</p>
<p>They spend the most money, some of their players have done steroids, their fans are arrogant, but I found myself cheering for the Yankees this fall.  Maybe it was guys like Jeter, Rivera and Posada that overshadow the flaws of other players and make baseball fun to watch (and yes, I did get sucked into that storyline).  Mark Teixeira signed a huge contract, but never acted like it.  As a lifelong Brewers fan, the memories from miraculous summer of 2008 are still fresh and I will always cheer for C.C. Sabathia.  He <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTT62U3Rj1Y" target="_blank">embraced </a>Milwaukee and I can&#8217;t blame him for leaving with that kind of money on the table.  He made the Yankees somewhat easy to cheer for this fall and I kept it to myself because of the backlash that would have followed.  Well, I am outing myself now and I&#8217;m ok with it.</p>
<p>So for everyone wavering on if it&#8217;s &#8216;cool&#8217; to cheer Peyton Manning, I say go ahead and cheer as loud as you can on Sunday.  Then again, I also argued why I&#8217;d like cheering for Brady and Belicheck before Spygate happened.  Please stay clean Coach Caldwell.</p>
<p><em>-Adam Somers</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://olbagofdonuts.com/index.php/2010/02/05/why-its-cool-to-cheer-for-peyton-manning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

